2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of two real-time PCR assays for the detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in clinical samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the different combination of REP/ABC results which were included as a complement in this study, we hypothesized earlier that different strains are present in Switzerland [3]. This study further supports this, since all three combinations were found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the different combination of REP/ABC results which were included as a complement in this study, we hypothesized earlier that different strains are present in Switzerland [3]. This study further supports this, since all three combinations were found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Further, single case samples of 23 farms from routine diagnosis, indicated by "P", were included. Most of the samples were collected in the context of a study on diagnosis of EP and are described there [3]. Only samples which were previously shown positive for M. hyopneumoniae in the real-time PCR were used for amplification of a part of the p146 gene.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Marois et al (2010), because of the great variability reported among M. hyopneumoniae strains, PCR assays using only one DNA target per reaction could have reduced performance. Nevertheless, a triplex RT-PCR developed by these authors showed approximately the same detection limit as other RT-PCR assays (DUBOSSON et al, 2004;STRAIT et al, 2008), which detect four targets independently. In our study, including more than one DNA target of the microorganism in the assay increased the number of positive samples detected, which is in agreement with Marois et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%