2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of two Danish building typologies for residential buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these projects have been published in several scientific articles, all with a different focus: the residential building stock of Greece has been modelled using the typology developed [13], while [14] demonstrated the energy performance of French residential buildings from a fuel poverty perspective using national statistics. In [15], the differences between topdown and bottom-up approaches in energy statistics has been showcased for Denmark. Research has also been carried out on a larger scale in [16], identifying 72 building types in the entire EU-25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these projects have been published in several scientific articles, all with a different focus: the residential building stock of Greece has been modelled using the typology developed [13], while [14] demonstrated the energy performance of French residential buildings from a fuel poverty perspective using national statistics. In [15], the differences between topdown and bottom-up approaches in energy statistics has been showcased for Denmark. Research has also been carried out on a larger scale in [16], identifying 72 building types in the entire EU-25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With today's focus on reducing energy consumption, Danish multi-storey buildings with solid masonry walls receive increasing attention due to their large potential for energy conservation and consequent reduction of CO2 emissions [2,3]. Multi-storey buildings have previously been studied extensively [4,5], and it was found that a great part of the buildings with solid masonry walls were typically built in the period 1850-1930, and to some degree in the period .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-storey buildings from 1850-1930 and 1930-1950 have a high energy consumption for space heating and domestic hot water of approximately 155 kWh/m², which could potentially be reduced to approximately 60 kWh/m², which is almost the level required for rather new buildings built according to the Danish Building Regulations 2010 [3]. In a later work [2] the space heating and domestic hot water demands for buildings from the same period was calculated to be 150 kWh/m². Total energy consumption, for all multi-storey building from the periods 1851-1930 and 1931-1950, was calculated to be 4.35 TWh/year and 2.35 TWh/year respectively, corresponding to approximately 3.2 % and 1.7 % of the total energy used for space heating and domestic hot water in Denmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest problem of the study is reported to be uncertainties regarding data quality. The Danish EPC system has also been criticized for being too expensive and the data unreliable [22], but the data has been used to describe the Danish building stock [11].…”
Section: Background Of the Swedish Epc Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data quality of the Swedish EPCs has been criticized [9,10]. The purpose of this paper is to assess and remediate the data uncertainty in the Gothenburg EPC data to be used to produce a comprehensive overview of energy usage in the building stock, as did Kragh and Wittchen [11] for the Danish building stock with different preconditions. The EPC database is compared with billing data from Riksbyggen, a real estate company with a portfolio of 170 000 apartments of which 13 500 are in Gothenburg, as well as data from the Gothenburg Housing and Urban Development office (HUD, Swedish translation: Stadsbyggnadskontoret).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%