The corrosion performance and electrical
contact resistance were
investigated for a trivalent chromium passivation layer and a cobalt-free
version of that same passivation layer on γ-ZnNi-coated Al 6061-T6.
Both passivation layers had a similar surface morphology, were amorphous,
had similar thicknesses, and contained pores within the passivation
layer. The cobalt-containing passivation layer initially had an exchange
current density of 9.5 × 10–4 A/cm2 and a polarization resistance of 290 Ω/cm2. The
cobalt-free passivation layer initially had an exchange current density
of 10.6 × 10–4 A/cm2 and a polarization
resistance of 116 Ω/cm2. After 500 h of exposure
to neutral salt spray, the cobalt-containing passivation layer showed
no visible corrosion and had an exchange current density of 2.9 ×
10–4 A/cm2 and a polarization resistance
of 136 Ω/cm2. The cobalt-free passivation layer showed
uniform corrosion and had an exchange current density of 5.2 ×
10–4 A/cm2 and a polarization resistance
of 80 Ω/cm2. After 500 h of exposure to neutral salt
spray on specimens which were scribes down to the Al substrate, the
cobalt-free passivation layers were uniformly corroded, but scribed
specimens with the cobalt-containing passivation layers were only
partially corroded. Both the cobalt-containing and cobalt-free passivation
layers were found to be viable alternatives to hexavalent chromium
as per the requirements of cobalt-containing MIL-DTL-81706 offering
protection comparable to hexavalent chromium and cobalt-free offering
less. The presence of cobalt in the TCP layer was found to improve
corrosion performance and suggested that an intermediate species such
as cobalt is beneficial to the oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI).