Development of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale

Wright, Stephen L.; Wright, Dorothy A.; Jenkins‐Guarnieri, Michael A.

doi:10.1177/0748175613484042

Cited by 20 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As the social relationships established by an individual are considered as a reference for his/her later experiences, researchers have developed the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale (SEOES) to measure social efficacy and outcome expectations together. The SEOES is consists of two sub-scales; Social Efficacy Scale (SES) and Outcome Expectations Scale (OES) (Wright et al 2013).…”

Section: ______________________mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In conclusion, the scale was completed with 18 items. In the final form of the scale, when the sixth and ninth items were taken out, the SES had 12 items and the OES had six items (Wright et al 2013).…”

Section: ______________________mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Social efficacy is also known as social courage, which includes the skills to belong to a group, attend activities and assist the other in group (Conolly 1989). The expectations about the results caused by social behaviors are social outcome expectations (Wright et al 2013) Outcome expectation is the intuition by the individual about the consequences he/she will face about some behaviors (Bandura 1977).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometric Properties of Adaptation of the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale to Turkish

Bakioğlu¹

2017

EUROPEAN J ED RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale (SEOES) on Turkish. The sample group included two groups of university students (ns= 440, 359). The validity of the scale was assessed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and concurrent validity, and the reliability was assessed using Cronbach Alpha's internal consistency coefficient, test-retest method and item discrimination. The findings obtained from the exploratory factor analysis showed that 51.2 percent of total variance of the scale was explained and the scale consisted of two subdimensions like the original one. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable fit to the data. The concurrent validity of the SEOES was respectively studied using (.65) Scale of Perceived Social Self-Efficacy; (.29) Satisfaction With Life Scale; and (-.36) UCLA Loneliness Scale. As for the scale's reliability, the internal consistency was determined to be .91; .92 for Social Efficacy Scale; and .81 for Outcome Expectations Scale. The results of test-retest result (.90) and the findings of item analysis showed that the items in Turkish version of the scales were compatible with the original one. The present results provide evidence supporting the validity and reliability Turkish version of the SEOES.

show abstract

Section: ______________________mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ______________________mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric Properties of Adaptation of the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale to Turkish

Bakioğlu¹

2017

EUROPEAN J ED RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale (Wright, Wright, & Jenkins-Guarnieri, 2013). The sample of study consists of 295 (177 female, 118 male) university students.…”

Section: The Validity and Reliability Study For The Turkish Version Omentioning

confidence: 99%

“…

C i l t / V o l u me : 4 2 0 1 5 -4 S a y ı / I s s u e : 1 H a z i r a n / J u n e 2 0 1 5 U l u s l a r a r a s ı H a k e m l i D e r g i I n t e r n a t i o n a l R e f e r e e d J o u r n a l 1

The Validity and Reliability Study for the Turkish Version of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations ScaleAbstract: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale (Wright, Wright, & Jenkins-Guarnieri, 2013). The sample of study consists of 295 (177 female, 118 male) university students.

…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sosyal Yeterlik ve Sosyal Sonuç Beklentileri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Akın¹

2015

BUEFAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C i l t / V o l u me : 4 2 0 1 5 -4 S a y ı / I s s u e : 1 H a z i r a n / J u n e 2 0 1 5 U l u s l a r a r a s ı H a k e m l i D e r g i I n t e r n a t i o n a l R e f e r e e d J o u r n a l 1 The Validity and Reliability Study for the Turkish Version of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations ScaleAbstract: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale (Wright, Wright, & Jenkins-Guarnieri, 2013). The sample of study consists of 295 (177 female, 118 male) university students. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the value of Kiser-meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy is .95 and a significant result is on Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2 = 3155.501 (p<.001). Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the eighteen items loaded on two factors: x²= 308.07, df= 132, RMSEA= .067, CFI= .94, IFI= .94, GFI= .90, SRMR= .045. The Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficients were found as .93 for social efficacy expectations, as .88 for social outcome expectations, and as .94 for overall scale. The corrected item-total correlations of Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale ranged from .57 to .74. These results demonstrate that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument.

show abstract

Family Influences on College Students' Anticipated Work‐Family Conflict, Social Self‐Efficacy, and Self‐Esteem

Wright

Kacmarski²,

Firsick

et al. 2020

The Career Development Quart

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors sought to test work-family conflict (WFC) theory by examining how family relationships may influence WFC, social self-efficacy, and self-esteem. They developed and tested a structural model of the relationship between family career influence and self-esteem through the mediating variables of anticipated emotionbased WFC, behavior-based WFC, and the cognitive variable of social self-efficacy. Data were collected from 301 college students (208 women, 93 men) and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results indicated that family career influence positively related to college students' self-esteem through the mediating variables of social self-efficacy and emotion-based WFC. Behavior-based WFC did not function as a mediating variable. When focusing on issues related to students' self-esteem, career counselors should address ways that family influences anticipated emotionbased WFC and use interventions designed to increase social self-efficacy. Future researchers should consider and test additional mediating factors that may help explain how the dimensions of WFC relate to self-esteem.

show abstract

Development of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale

Cited by 20 publications

References 37 publications

Psychometric Properties of Adaptation of the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale to Turkish

Psychometric Properties of Adaptation of the Social Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scale to Turkish

Sosyal Yeterlik ve Sosyal Sonuç Beklentileri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Family Influences on College Students' Anticipated Work‐Family Conflict, Social Self‐Efficacy, and Self‐Esteem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About