Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computin 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1839379.1839446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the scoring mechanism for the concept map based intelligent knowledge assessment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demonstrated knowledge of the learners was used to examine the extent of achieving the learning outcomes. The research in [35] perused the technique of scoring the students' knowledge through parameters like linkages of concepts established in the concept maps and patterns of correct and semi-correct propositions established for making the linkages. However, no specific standard is established to rate students' knowledge through their developed concept maps [28].…”
Section: Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstrated knowledge of the learners was used to examine the extent of achieving the learning outcomes. The research in [35] perused the technique of scoring the students' knowledge through parameters like linkages of concepts established in the concept maps and patterns of correct and semi-correct propositions established for making the linkages. However, no specific standard is established to rate students' knowledge through their developed concept maps [28].…”
Section: Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system can operate a) in mode of knowledge selfassessment allowing a student to assess his/her knowledge level and to learn more about a specific topic in case of incomplete knowledge, or b) in mode of knowledge control intended for the determination of students' knowledge level by a teacher [28].…”
Section: Overview Of Ikasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of studies in pedagogy are devoted to the issue of assessing knowledge. In particular: monitoring the quality of education (Cherednichenko and Yangolenko [7], He and He [16], Igbape and Idogho [19], Leontev et al [21], Li et al [22], Muhd Nor et al [25], Qin et al [30], Sorour et al [49], Wei [54], Zhi and Nan [56] and others); development of modern innovative technologies that are included in the knowledge assessment system (Anohina-Naumeca, Strautmane and Grundspenkis [2], Anohina-Naumeca and Grundspenkis [1], Gierłowski and Nowicki [13], Grundspenkis [14], Schmuck, Sima and Szöllosi [41], Szöllosi, Sima and Schmuck [50] and others); the use of a multi-point scale for assessing knowledge, abilities, and skills (Bespalko [5], Linn [23] and others); theoretical approaches to the assessment of students' knowledge, their development and improvement (Clotfelter, Ladd and Vigdor [8], Falchikov and Boud [11], Falchikov and Goldfinch [12], Host, Regnell and Wohlin [17], Hwang and Chang [18], Newble and Jaeger [27], Osadchyi et al [28], Rust, Price and Berry [39], Scouller [42], Topping [53], Wiliam et al [55] and others); evaluation of test results in an adaptive automated testing system, taking into account the ambiguity of the formulations of answers (Barker [3], Phankokkruad and Woraratpanya [29], Rudinskiy [38] and others). In [6] we substantiated the structural model of the neuro-fuzzy system of professional selection of students for training in IT specialties by studying the psychological characteristics, personal qualities and factual knowledge, skills and abilities of students as a unity of fuzzy and stochastic data base of t...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%