2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00737-015-0553-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Perinatal Depression Inventory (PDI)-14 using item response theory: a comparison of the BDI-II, EPDS, PDI, and PHQ-9

Abstract: The objective of this study is to develop a simple, brief, self-report perinatal depression inventory that accurately measures severity in a number of populations. Our team developed 159 Likert-scale perinatal depression items using simple sentences with a fifth-grade reading level. Based on iterative cognitive interviewing (CI), an expert panel improved and winnowed the item pool based on pre-determined criteria. The resulting 67 items were administered to a sample of 628 pregnant and 251 postpartum women wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the EPDS as the measure for probable depression diagnosis may be less ideal as an assessment of depressive symptoms in the postnatal period may due to extra postpartum duties associated with the arrival of a newborn. Possible limitations of the EPDS tool and an alternative device were recently highlighted [ 52 ], similar to previously published shortcomings [ 53 , 54 ] and alternatives to the EPDS [ 55 , 56 ]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that even if a screening tool is error-free, its interpretation (i.e., the assignment of a positive or negative outcome) may still be incorrect [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The use of the EPDS as the measure for probable depression diagnosis may be less ideal as an assessment of depressive symptoms in the postnatal period may due to extra postpartum duties associated with the arrival of a newborn. Possible limitations of the EPDS tool and an alternative device were recently highlighted [ 52 ], similar to previously published shortcomings [ 53 , 54 ] and alternatives to the EPDS [ 55 , 56 ]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that even if a screening tool is error-free, its interpretation (i.e., the assignment of a positive or negative outcome) may still be incorrect [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The current study suffers some limitations. While the BDI‐II is widely used and well validated as self‐report assessment of depression (Brodey et al ., ; Hobkirk et al ., ; Wu & Huang, ), and demonstrated high reliability and construct validity in the present sample, it does reflect the individual's own report of depressive symptoms. Despite evidence that self‐report measures are quite accurate in assessing emotions and behaviors (Spain, Eaton & Funder, ), a structured clinical interview with fathers who scored above referral cut‐offs on the BDI‐II would have made possible the confirmation of a diagnosis of depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BDI‐II has also been validated for use with mothers pre‐ and postpartum (e.g. Boyd, Le & Somberg, ; Brodey, Goodman, Baldasaro, et al ., ; Tandon, Cluxton‐Keller, Leis & Perry, ). Although high scores on the BDI‐II do not suffice for diagnosing depression in clinical practice, it was used here as reference measure for suspected depression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States (U.S.) reported an overall PPD prevalence of 11.5% which ranged from 8 % to 20.1% [13]. The determination of PPD prevalence is complicated by the fact that rates are calculated using different diagnostic criteria, especially when defining time of onset or offset, and a variety of screening tools and tool cut-offs are used [14][15][16][17]. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [18] is the most widely used self-report screening tool, a ten-item scale that has been validated for use during pregnancy and postpartum [19] and in multiple languages.…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%