2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the pediatric accommodation scale: Reliability and validity of clinician- and parent-report measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
68
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
68
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Severity and interference ratings range from 0 (none; no interference) to 4 (extreme; interference from accommodation is disabling in one or more areas; overall functioning is severely limited due to accommodation). The PAS yields 3 subscales: the PAS Frequency scale, measuring frequency of accommodation over the previous week across all items; the PAS Parent Impact scale (impact ratings for 4 items), measuring impact of accommodation on the parent over the previous week; and the PAS Child Impact scale (impact ratings for 7 items), measuring impact of accommodation on the child over the previous week (Benito et al, 2015). In addition, there are three global items assessing accommodation from the primary caregiver, secondary caregiver, and first sibling.…”
Section: Pediatric Accommodation Scale (Pas; Benito Et Al 2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Severity and interference ratings range from 0 (none; no interference) to 4 (extreme; interference from accommodation is disabling in one or more areas; overall functioning is severely limited due to accommodation). The PAS yields 3 subscales: the PAS Frequency scale, measuring frequency of accommodation over the previous week across all items; the PAS Parent Impact scale (impact ratings for 4 items), measuring impact of accommodation on the parent over the previous week; and the PAS Child Impact scale (impact ratings for 7 items), measuring impact of accommodation on the child over the previous week (Benito et al, 2015). In addition, there are three global items assessing accommodation from the primary caregiver, secondary caregiver, and first sibling.…”
Section: Pediatric Accommodation Scale (Pas; Benito Et Al 2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are three global items assessing accommodation from the primary caregiver, secondary caregiver, and first sibling. Psychometric support for the PAS has been reported, including strong internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and construct validity (Benito et al, 2015). The PAS was completed at the pre-and post-treatment assessments.…”
Section: Pediatric Accommodation Scale (Pas; Benito Et Al 2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we report on the nature and incidence of family accommodation among youth with tics. In light of our clinical experiences as well as considering data among youth with OCD and anxiety [18,20,21,23,25,27,28,31], we expected that parents of youth with TS would endorse significant rates of family accommodation with a frequency lower than that observed among samples of youth with OCD or anxiety disorders. Second, we examined the reliability and factor structure of a measure of tic-related family accommodation, namely the Tic Family Accommodation Scale, in a sample of youth with TS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thirdly, we examined clinical correlates of family accommodation, namely tic symptom severity, functional impairment, child anxiety and depressive symptoms, and child externalizing behavior problems. Given findings in youth with OCD and anxiety [18,20,21,23,25,27,28,31], positive associations between these clinical variables and family accommodation were expected. Fourth, we investigated the extent to which child anxiety, depressive symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and tic symptom severity predict family accommodation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation