Development of the Paper and Pencil Version of Self-Esteem Implicit Association Test for Children (SE-IAT-C): Investigation of the Reliability and Validity Utilizing Assessment of Children by Teachers

Yokoshima, Takayuki; Uchiyama, Yumi; Uchida, Kanako; Yamasaki, Katsuyuki

doi:10.4992/pacjpa.81.0_1b-086

Cited by 1 publication

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The correlations were similar to or higher than previous IAT measures (Bosson et al, 2000;Greenwald & Farnham, 2000). Yokoshima et al (2017) examined validity using teachers' assessments of children with high and low scores on this test. The teachers were the participants' homeroom teachers who had known the children well.…”

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…Moreover, Yokoshima, Ogami, et al (2019) confirmed the reliability and validity of the tablet PC version. Validity was confirmed via homeroom teachers' assessment of the children with high and low scores on the test in terms of autonomous self-esteem using similar methods to Yokoshima et al (2017).…”

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The 10 items in the RSES are shown in Table 1. However, when scrutinizing the contents of the items in terms ofcontent validity, it seems likely that most of the items do not represent the "good enough" type (Yamasaki, Yokoshima, & Uchida, 2017). To put it concretely, among the items in the RSES, items 4, 7, 6, and 9 cannot discriminate between "very good" and "good enough."…”

Section: What Does the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale Measure?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the limitations of previous IATs for self-esteem, Yokoshima et al (2017) developed a new IAT measure for children (the paper and pencil version of Self-Esteem Implicit Association Test for Children (SE-IAT-C). The reason why they developed the children's version was to examine the effectiveness of a program to cultivate adaptive autonomous self-esteem for children.…”

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Blocks <3 and 4> and <6 and 7> are counterbalanced. After developing the original version of this test, Yokoshima et al (2017) and Yokoshima, Ogami, Kaya, and Yamasaki (2019) examined test reliability and validity. No previous IAT measures tested the validity directly in terms of the construct itself.…”

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Why Do Researchers and Educators Still Use the Rosenberg Scale? Alternative New Concepts and Measurement Tools for Self-Esteem

Yamasaki¹

2019

JPBS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) has been the most frequently and widely used tool in self-esteem research and education. Until recently, findings on self-esteem have steadily accumulated using this scale. However, in recent years, more studies began to indicate various faults of the RSES, particularly in that it does not measure what Rosenberg (1965) demonstrated as the concept of desirable self-esteem. In this paper, first, it isdiscussed why the RSES should not be used in terms of validity. Thereafter, recent new concepts of self-esteem are introduced, including concepts by Deci and Ryan (1995), Kernis (2003), and Yamasaki et al. (2017). Next, according to Yamasaki et al. (2017), it is suggested that desirable self-esteem testing is needed using certain non-conscious measuring tools because self-report (i.e., consciously answered) questionnaires cannot capture desirable components of self-esteem. Regarding new assessment tools, newly developed implicit association tests (IATs) that are completely distinct from previous ones are discussed in terms of their measurementof desirable self-esteem. Finally, it is discussed how programs to enhance desirable selfesteem should operate, given their effectiveness. Thus, the current paper emphasizes the necessity to disseminate new concepts, measuring tools, and programs to correct wrong avenues on which researchers and educators have been treading.

show abstract

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 51%

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: What Does the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale Measure?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development Of New Iat Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations