Development of the outcome expectancy scale for self-care among periodontal disease patients

Kakudate, Naoki; Morita, Manabu; Fukuhara, Shunichi; Sugai, Makoto; Nagayama, Masato; Isogai, Emiko; Kawanami, Masamitsu; Chiba, Itsuo

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01425.x

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of behavioral science, belief about the effectiveness of caries risk assessment is related to “outcome expectation,” which is the belief that performing a specific behavior (caries risk assessment) will lead to a desired outcome (dental caries prevention). Previous research has suggested that those outcome expectations are important predictors of dental preventive behavior . In our study, 30 percent of dentists had a low outcome expectancy toward the effectiveness of caries risk assessment compared with 23 percent in the US DPBRN.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

Evidence‐practice gap for in‐office fluoride application in a dental practice‐based research network

Yokoyama

Kakudate

Sumida³

et al. 2015

J Public Health Dent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aims of this study were to examine dentists’ recommendations for in-office fluoride to patients, and identify dentists’ characteristics associated with these recommendations. Study Design and Setting The study was conducted using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey in Japan. The survey queried dentists (N=282) in outpatient dental practices affiliated with the Dental Practice-based Research Network Japan (JDPBRN). This network aims to assist dentists in investigating research questions and sharing their experience and expertise. Results The responses were obtained by 189 dentists (67%). Among valid response, fifty-four percent of dentists (n=98) recommend in-office fluoride to more than 50% of their patients aged 6–18 years and 15% (n=29) recommended this care to more than 50% of their patients aged over 18 years. Multiple logistic regression analysis suggested that factors associated with the percentage of patients who are recommended in-office fluoride included patient interest in caries prevention; dentist belief in the effectiveness of caries risk assessment. Conclusions Dentist practice patterns for recommending in-office fluoride vary widely. Recommendation was significantly related to having a higher percentage of patients interested in caries prevention, and to the dentist’s belief about the effectiveness of caries risk assessment. (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT01680848).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

Evidence‐practice gap for in‐office fluoride application in a dental practice‐based research network

Yokoyama

Kakudate

Sumida³

et al. 2015

J Public Health Dent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self‐efficacy refers to how certain an individual feels about their ability to take actions necessary to improve and maintain health outcome expectancy as assessment of a given behaviour which may lead to a certain outcome. It has been suggested that outcome expectancy is largely based on self‐efficacy and, therefore, do not strongly contribute to behaviour prediction . In this study, the respondents seemed to accomplish the actions of self‐efficacy related to oral health necessary to achieve specific satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 67%

“…Consistent with this concept, behavioural interventions in dentistry that enhance self‐efficacy, behaviour control and self‐monitoring are associated with an increased awareness of dental care behaviour . Various studies have reported associations between self‐efficacy and oral health behaviours, including tooth brushing, flossing and adhering to periodontal, and oral hygiene regimens . Overall, improving self‐efficacy is an important component in changing dental health‐related behaviours …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Rachmawati

Maharani

Oho

2019

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background Self‐efficacy can be interpreted as a self‐belief that one has successfully committed to a specific situation or maintained a specific behaviour. Aim We aimed to test the reliability and validity of a cross‐cultural adaptation of the self‐efficacy oral health (SEOH) questionnaire in the Indonesian language among adolescents and to understand the diverse perspectives of oral health self‐efficacy related to gender. Design A cross‐cultural adaptation of the SEOH self‐administered questionnaire was completed followed by a dental caries examination. Sample size estimation suggested 341 adolescents aged 12‐13 years. Eleven junior high schools were clustered and randomly selected from six districts across Jakarta, Indonesia. Results The SEOH was reliable with interclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha values of 0.86 and 0.86, respectively. Significant results for the construct and discriminant validity analyses were observed. There was no significant difference in terms of the total score between males and females, but there was a significant difference in terms of the psychology control domain. Conclusions Our study results provide evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of the SEOH questionnaire for adolescents across Indonesia.

show abstract

“…However, as the instruments employed in studies are not always optimal, research results cannot be understood within a consequent context. Research in expectations within the discipline areas related to orthodontics [32] and periodontics [15,16] appear to have instruments with good validity and reliability. The expectations concepts are explored deeper and multidimensional as well.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patients' expectations from dental implants: a systematic review of the literature

Yao

Tang

Gao

et al. 2014

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo examine the current literature on the impact of patients’ expectations on treatment outcomes or final patient satisfaction and to identify the theoretical frameworks, study designs and measurement instruments which have been employed to assess patients’ expectations within implant dentistry.MethodsA structured literature search of four databases Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science and PsychINFO was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Any type of literature published in English discussing the topic of ‘patients expectations’ in oral health were identified and further screened. Studies reporting on expectations regarding dental implants were selected and a narrative review was conducted.ResultsThe initial search yielded 16707 studies, out of which 1051 ‘potentially effective studies’ were further assessed and final 41 ‘effective studies’ were included [Kappa = 0.76]. Ten observational studies, published from 1999 to 2013, dealt specifically with expectations of dental implants. There was a large degree of heterogeneity among studies in terms of assessment instruments. Expectations relating to aesthetics and function were primarily considered. Among the 10 studies, 8 were classified as quantitative research and 2 as qualitative research. The STROBE quality of reporting scores of the studies ranged from 13.5 to 18.0. Three of the 8 quantitative studies employed a before/after study design (prospective studies) and used visual analogue scales (VAS) to measure patient expectations.ConclusionsThere is a growing interest in patients’ expectations of dental implants. Most studies are cross sectional in nature and the quality of reporting varies considerably. Expectations with respect to aesthetics and function are key attributes considered. The use of visual analogue scales (VAS) provides quantitative assessments of patients’ expectations but the lack of standardization of measures prohibits meta- analyses.

show abstract

Development of the outcome expectancy scale for self-care among periodontal disease patients

Abstract: We developed a 13-item OESS with high reliability and validity which may be used to assess outcome expectancy for self-care. A patient's psychological condition with regard to behaviour and affective status can be accurately evaluated using the OESS with SESS.

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

Evidence‐practice gap for in‐office fluoride application in a dental practice‐based research network

Evidence‐practice gap for in‐office fluoride application in a dental practice‐based research network

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Patients' expectations from dental implants: a systematic review of the literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About