Development of the Objective, Structured Communication Assessment of Residents (OSCAR) Tool for Measuring Communication Skills With Patients

Abstract

Background Although interpersonal and communication skills are essential to physician practice, there is a dearth of effective tools to meaningfully teach and assess communication skills. Objective The purpose of our study was to create a standardized tool for evaluation of communication skills for residents across specialties. Methods We designed an Objective, Structured Communication Assessment of Residents (OSCAR) tool, consisting of 4 clinical stations, to assess intern communication skills with relationship development, their establishment of case goals, and their organization and time management skills. Interns from 11 training programs completed the stations, with senior residents trained to function as standardized patients. The 4 stations' scenarios were a disruptive patient, handling a phone call for a narcotics refill, disclosing a medical mistake, and delivering bad news. Results Eighty-three interns completed OSCAR during orientation. The assessment took interns about 40 minutes to complete, and participants were given immediate feedback by the standardized patients. The total possible score for each station was 50. Resident performance was highest for disclosing a medical error (94%, 47 of 50), followed by handling a disruptive patient (90%, 45 of 50), disclosing bad news (86%, 43 of 50), and handling the phone call for the narcotics refill (62%, 31 of 50). Multivariate analysis of variance results indicated differences between residents from US and international medical schools, but there were no significant differences across specialties. Interrater reliability was excellent for each station (> 0.80). Conclusions OSCAR is a practical tool for assessing interns' communication skills to provide timely results to program directors.

Interactional skills training in undergraduate medical education: ten principles for guiding future research

“…The student’s performance is rated against a checklist by the simulated patient or an observer. OSCEs have been developed to assess interactional skills in breaking bad news, disclosing a medical error, handling a disruptive patient, and dealing with a phone call for a narcotics refill [27]. The key advantage of simulations is that they enable students to demonstrate the application of knowledge and skills to a clinical scenario.…”

Improving Communication Skills: A Course for Academic Medical Center Surgery Residents and Faculty

“…35 Residents were taught to be standardized patients for each other in an Objective, Structured Communication Assessment of Residents (OSCAR) using 4 scenarios taking approximately 40 minutes per resident. 36 In both the faculty and resident courses taught at Penn, the intent was to provide a foundational experience to be emphasized through further, more individualized teaching at the bedside or in other educational formats. The courses were taught to large groups in short sessions-60 minutes for faculty and 45 minutes for residents-for which roleplaying was not feasible.…”

The Performance of the Health Communication Assessment Tool© (HCAT-f) in Calibrating Different Levels of Nurse Communication Skills in a French-Speaking Context

“…In a review of current existing instruments used to teach and evaluate nurses' communication skills, Campbell et al (2017) noticed that there was a lack of valid and reliable instruments which can be used in the context of simulation-based teaching. Most instruments either focus on a specific type of therapeutic relationship, e.g., with patients with cancer (Aranda & Yates, 2009), or communication skills like jargon explanation (Caron et al, 2013) or from a patient perspective (T-com skill scale, Baumaan et al, 2008).…”