2016
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1253723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Nondestructive Leaf Area Estimation Model for Valeriana (Valeriana jatamansi Jones)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were verified by Teixeira et al (2012), Teixeira et al (2013) and Schmildt et al (2015), which found values of 0.88 between leaf length and leaf width from the fourth leaf pair for 269 C. arabica plant materials. The leaf surface of a coffee plant is an indicative for the crop yield potential, wherein larger leaf areas implies in larger surfaces for light interception, which may result in higher photosynthetic rates and carbohydrates availability to coffee development (Valadares et al, 2016;Walia and Kumar, 2016). Therefore, breeding programs should choose plant materials with larger leaves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were verified by Teixeira et al (2012), Teixeira et al (2013) and Schmildt et al (2015), which found values of 0.88 between leaf length and leaf width from the fourth leaf pair for 269 C. arabica plant materials. The leaf surface of a coffee plant is an indicative for the crop yield potential, wherein larger leaf areas implies in larger surfaces for light interception, which may result in higher photosynthetic rates and carbohydrates availability to coffee development (Valadares et al, 2016;Walia and Kumar, 2016). Therefore, breeding programs should choose plant materials with larger leaves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a model must not be selected only for the high value of R 2 , during the modeling, but by the interpretation of all the statistical measures of validation from an independent sample of that used for modeling (Bosco et al, 2012;Fascella, Darwich, & Rouphael, 2013;Schmildt et al, 2016;Walia & Kumar, 2017). The validation made from the sample of garden boldo leaves verified that from the 12 adjusted equations, only those that used LW as an independent variable in the linear, quadratic and power models are suitable, according to the criteria of statistically linear coefficient equal to zero and statistically angular coefficient equal to one (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf area modeling has been performed for medicinal species such as juazeiro (Zizyphus joazeiro Mart) (Maracajá, Madalena, Araújo, Lima, & Linhares, 2008), mofumbo (Combretum leprosum Mart) (Candido, Coelho, Maia, Cunha, & Silva, 2013), Bauhinia monandra Kurz (Schmildt, Schmildt, Alexandre, Fernandes, & Czepak, 2016), Valerian (Valeriana jatamansi Jones) (Walia & Kumar, 2017) and boldo (Plectranthus ornatus) (Silva, Pereira, Cabanez, Mendonça, & Amaral, 2017). However, we did not find in the literature any equation to estimate the leaf area of garden boldo (Plectranthus barbatus Andrews).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent leaf area estimation models were considered and aware of the two-dimensional nature of leaf; however, most still used a simple regression model (Walia and Kumar 2017;Fascella et al 2018), without zeroing the intercept. Most simple regression and other models have serious bias in estimating leaf area of smaller size leaves, culminated at point if L = 0 and/or W = 0.…”
Section: Justifying Zero Intercept Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%