2014
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Abstract: The standard approach for documenting symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials involves investigator reporting using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Because this approach underdetects symptomatic AEs, the NCI issued two contracts to create a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system as a companion to the CTCAE, called the PRO-CTCAE. This Commentary describes development of the PRO-CTCAE by a group of multidisciplinary inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
519
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 707 publications
(535 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
519
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing these open questions is becoming increasingly relevant and, in recognition of the importance of considering direct patient involvement in side effect collection and grading, the National Cancer Institute is financing, supporting, and disseminating a PRO version of the CTCAE system (PRO-CTCAE) 15 based on 78 toxicity items mapped to the CTCAE. For each toxicity, PRO-CTCAE contains up to three patient questions that define the grade of severity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addressing these open questions is becoming increasingly relevant and, in recognition of the importance of considering direct patient involvement in side effect collection and grading, the National Cancer Institute is financing, supporting, and disseminating a PRO version of the CTCAE system (PRO-CTCAE) 15 based on 78 toxicity items mapped to the CTCAE. For each toxicity, PRO-CTCAE contains up to three patient questions that define the grade of severity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since underreporting of chemotherapy-related side effects is a problem even in the highly controlled clinical trial environment, it is likely to be even more pronounced in routine clinical practice, where reporting does not follow strict standards. Consequently, there is growing interest in including "patient-reported outcomes" (PROs) in a CTCAE-compliant manner, where PROs are subjective reports from patients without medical interpretation (e.g., quality of life questionnaires) [12][13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute radiation toxicities were defined per CTCAE version 4.0 (30)(31)(32). Patients were routinely followed in clinic after treatment, and late radiation toxicities were defined as symptoms that occurred 3 months or later post-treatment.…”
Section: Acute and Late Radiation Toxicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AEs of the patients, including hyperbilirubinemia and transaminase levels, were evaluated using the CTCAE system (version 4.0), which is maintained by the US National Cancer Institute (28), and is widely used in oncology clinical practice to document the adverse effects of cancer treatment. The CTCAE grade reflects the severity of an AE on a scale of 1 to 5 with unique clinical descriptions based on this general guideline (where Grade 1 is mild and Grade 5 is lethal).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Aesmentioning
confidence: 99%