Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity

Monticone, Marco; Ferrante, Simona; Salvaderi, Stefano; Rocca, Barbara; Totti, Valentina; Foti, Calogero; Roi, Giulio Sergio

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.01.001

Cited by 60 publications

(89 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the other version of KOOS, correlation between these two subscales was weak significant or not significant, also. [67813141516] As this general health subscale of SF-36 is a general item that has general questions to assess the QOL, but symptoms’ subscale of IKOOS is a specific item that includes specific questions about knee joint, it was expected that the relationship between these two subscales was not significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, severe disability of patients in our study may be the cause of this finding. [567891013141517]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the questionnaires of the knee is Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), which assess the long- and short-term sings and dysfunction in patient with knee disability and osteoarthritis. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of KOOS questionnaire were credible in many countries with different languages such as French,[5] Portuguese,[6] Italian,[7] Swedish,[8] Arabic,[9] Greek,[10] Spanish,[11] Japanese,[12] Dutch,[13] Polish,[14] Singapore-English,[15] Chinese-English,[15] and American versions. [16] Iranian version of KOOS (IKOOS) was established by Salavati et al .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients with isolated meniscus injury; Validity and reliability

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The aim of this study is evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Persian version of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with isolated meniscus injury.Materials and Methods:One hundred people with isolated meniscal injury (29 females and 71 males with a mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 32.37 ± 9.97 years) and fifty normal people with no knee problems (34 females and 16 males with a mean age ± SD = 28.42 ± 8.84 years) participated in this study. In patients, the duration of meniscus injury ranged from 1 month to 4 years. For evaluation of discriminate validity, we compared scores of KOOS questionnaire between patients and healthy people, and for concurrent validity, in addition to filling KOOS questionnaire, patients completed Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire, test–retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient) ICC), and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha was calculated.Results:Mean scores of patients (49.51 ± 17.13) and healthy people (86.01 ± 13.44) were different significantly (P < 0.001). The correlation between total score of SF-36 and KOOS was significant (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). ICC was 0.80 (ranged from 0.64–0.75) and Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 (ranged from 0.72 to 0.94).Conclusion:The Iranian version of KOOS is a reliable and valid tool for patients with isolated meniscus injury, so the clinicians and investigators may use this questionnaire in clinical settings and their researches.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, severe disability of patients in our study may be the cause of this finding. [567891013141517]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients with isolated meniscus injury; Validity and reliability

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, patients with the UOA still in place were subject to functional and radiographic evaluation. Joint function was assessed through the Italian version of the self-assessed Knee injury and osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which evaluates different aspects of knee and patient function by different sub-scales (symptoms, stiffness, pain, daily function and sport activities) [12][13][14].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is unicondylar osteoarticular allograft still a viable option for reconstructions around the knee?

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Clinical outcome was analysed at a minimum of one year after TKA by an independent observer and included functional status evaluation using the validated Italian version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) [17]. The KOOS subscale for sports and recreation was not included in the assessment.…”

Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and kinematics in total knee arthroplasty

Digennaro

Zambianchi

Marcovigi

et al. 2014

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Posterior stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design development that focused on restoring normal knee kinematics was followed by the introduction of reasonguided motion designs. Although all PS fixed-bearing knee designs were thought to have similar kinematics, reports show they have differing incidences and magnitudes of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation. In this retrospective comparative study between two guided-motion total knee systems, we hypothesised that kinematic pattern has an influence on clinical and functional outcomes. Methods This study represents the continuation of a previously reported clinical and kinematics analysis. We retrospectively reviewed 347 patients treated with two different TKA designs: Scorpio NRG (Stryker Orthopedics) and Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilised (BCS) knee system (Smith & Nephew). Two hundred and eighty-one patients were assessed clinically. Patients were divided into groups according to implanted TKA. Clinical evaluation with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire was performed. Fifteen Scorpio NRG and 16 Journey BCS patients underwent video fluoroscopy during stair climbing, chair rising/sitting and step up/down at six months of follow-up. Results At an average 29 months of clinical follow-up, patients with Journey BCS TKAs reported better clinical results. Stiffness was more frequently reported in the Journey group (5.2 % vs 1.2 %), whereas anterior knee pain was observed in the Scorpio NRG group (1.9 %) only. Both prosthetic models reported different posterior translation of the medial and lateral contact points (CP) in all analysed motor tasks during knee flexion (BCS 10-18 mm; NRG Scorpio 2-3 mm). Both designs produced progressive external rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibia during flexion. Conclusions Journey BCS showed statistically significant better KOOS results. The higher posterior femoral rollback observed in the kinematic assessment of this design, associated with a better patellofemoral design, may be the reason for better clinical outcome. The reported cases of stiffness and anterolateral joint pain could be attributed to excessive medial and lateral tibiofemoral posterior translation. The NRG group demonstrated good axial rotation, but this was not coupled with physiological kinematic patterns. Patellofemoral pain can be explained by a less friendly femoral-groove design. TKA clinical-functional outcome and complications were highly influenced by the bearing geometry and kinematic pattern of prosthetic designs.

show abstract

Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity

Abstract: The KOOS outcome measure was successfully translated into Italian, and proved to have good psychometric properties that replicated the results of existing versions. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes in patients with knee injuries.

Cited by 60 publications

References 16 publications

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients with isolated meniscus injury; Validity and reliability

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients with isolated meniscus injury; Validity and reliability

Is unicondylar osteoarticular allograft still a viable option for reconstructions around the knee?

Design and kinematics in total knee arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About