Development of the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT): Construction, validity, reliability, and normative data

Aaron, Dorit H.; Jansen, Caroline W. Stegink

doi:10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80019-4

Cited by 120 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Önceden de belirtildiği gibi anketler hem aktivite hem de katılımı, performans testleri ise aktiviteyi değerlendirme yeteneğine sahip olsalar bile birbirlerine üstünlüklerinden bahsederken dikkatli olmak gerekir (7). Fizik muayenede saptanan kısıtlılıklar ile beraber, mevcut durumun el becerilerini ve fonksiyonlarını nasıl ve ne derece etkilediğinin saptanması, takibin sağlığı açısından önemlidir (1)(2)(3)28). Birbirini tamamlayıcı nitelikte olan bu değerlendirme yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanılması önerilmektedir (8).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Bilek Düzeyi Sinir, Parmak Düzeyi Tendon/Kırık Yaralanmalı Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme Anketleri El Fonksiyon Testleri ile ilişkili midir

Akkaya¹,

Başakçi²,

Erel³

et al. 2013

Tftr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖzetAmaç: El bileği veya parmak düzeyinde yaralanması olan hastalarda el fonksiyon testlerinin hasta tarafından yanıtlanan fonksiyonel değerlendirme anketleri ile ilişkisinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: El bilek düzeyinde sinir yaralanması (median/ulnar) (EBS grubu) veya parmak düzeyinde kırık ve/veya tendon yaralanması (PKT grubu) olan 43 hastanın demografik verileri kaydedildi. Muayene ile saptanan fonksiyonel düzeyleri EBS grubundaki hastalar için Seddon fonksiyonel sonuç skalasına göre, PKT grubundaki hastalar için BuckGramco'ya göre değerlendirildi. Tüm hastalara Sollerman El Fonksiyon Testi (SEFT) uygulandı, Quick-DASH ve Duruöz El İndeksi (DEİ) doldurtuldu. El kaba kavrama kas gücü sağlam tarafa göre leze elin yüzdesi olarak hesaplandı. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması ve cinsiyet dağılımı açısından gruplar arasında fark saptanmadı (p=0,429, p=0,229). EBS grubunda Seddon'a göre hastaların 3'ü (%14,3) çok iyi, 10'u (%47,6) iyi, 6'sı (%28,6) orta, 2'si (%9,5) kötü idi. PKT grubunda Buck-Gramko'ya göre bir (%4,5) mükemmel, 9 (%40,9) iyi, 4 (%18,2) zayıf, 8(%36,4) kötü hasta vardı. EBS ve PKT grubunda sırasıyla SEFT puanı 72, 3±16,8, 76,1±5,6,9±19,4,19,6±15,2, DEİ puanı 19,3±21,2,11,3±10,6, leze el kas gücü yüzdesi 65,4±29,9, 72,5±25,8'di. SEFT hem EBS hem PKT grubunda Q-DASH, Duruöz skorları ile anlamlı koreleydi (p<0,05). EBS grubunda SEFT ile Seddon (r=0,449) ve kas gücü arasında (r=0,585) anlamlı ilişki vardı. PKT grubunda SEFT ile Buck-Gramco arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmazken kas gücü ile anlamlı pozitif ilişki bulundu(r=0,463). Sonuç: El fonksiyon testinin hem bilek düzeyinde sinir yaralanması olan hastalarda, hem de parmak düzeyinde tendon yaralanması veya kırık olan hastalarda hasta bazlı fonksiyonel değerlendirme yapan anketlerle pozitif korelasyon gösterdiği saptandı. Türk Fiz T›p Re hab Derg 2013;59:112-6. Anah tar Ke li me ler: El fonksiyonu, falanks kırığı, sinir yaralanması, tendon yaralanması Sum maryObjective: We aimed to research the relationship between functional assessment questionnaires answered by patients and hand function tests in patients with injury on level of wrists or fingers. Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics of 43 patients with nerve injury at the level of wrists (median/ulnar) (LW group) and patients with fracture or tendon injury at the level of fingers (LF group) were recorded. Functional level detected by examination was evaluated according to the Seddon classification in LW group, and according to Buck-Gramco scores in LF group. The Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT) was administered to all patients, and the Quick-DASH (Q-DASH) and Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) were completed by all patients. Hand grip strength was expressed as a percentage of that of the uninjured hand. . Results: There was no difference in mean age and distribution of gender between the groups (p=0.429, p=0.229). Three (14.3%) patients had excellent, 10 (47.6%) good, 6 (28.6%) moderate, and 2 (9.5%) patients had poor results according to the Seddon classification in LW grou...

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Bilek Düzeyi Sinir, Parmak Düzeyi Tendon/Kırık Yaralanmalı Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme Anketleri El Fonksiyon Testleri ile ilişkili midir

Akkaya¹,

Başakçi²,

Erel³

et al. 2013

Tftr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All patients were asked to perform the FDS and MMS/clock drawing tests according to the already published standardized protocols [13][14][15][16]. For the clock drawing test, we used the scoring method described by Mainland and Shulman [15].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For a brief description of the FDS test, patients were asked to turn over 16 wooden sticks on a board against the clock with their dominant hand. Dropping sticks or deviating from the tests' standardized protocol [13,16] resulted in additional penalty time. Time spans ranging from 15 to 33 s to complete the test were regarded as sufficient dexterity, time spans over 33 s were regarded as reduced dexterity [16].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Status and Functional Dexterity as Outcome Predictors Following Urinary Diversion: A Combined Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the validated functional dexterity test and the Mini-Mental Status test on subjective functional outcomes, medical care situation, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after urinary diversion (UD). Patients and Methods: A total of 106 patients (n = 26 ileal conduits, n = 29 neobladders, and n = 51 ileocecal pouches) were included in this combined retrospective (n = 77) and prospective (n = 29) observational study. All patients performed the 2 tests mentioned above and filled out self-designed questionnaires with diversion and HRQoL items. In the prospective cohort, the tests were performed preoperatively and the questionnaires were filled out preoperatively as well as 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: Reduced dexterity and cognitive skills were significantly associated with increased patient age and subjective constraints in stoma care of ileal conduits, self-catheterization in ileocecal pouches, and continence in neobladders. Overall HRQoL, however, was not affected by dexterity or cognitive measures. Conclusions: Assessing the cognitive status and functional dexterity of patients undergoing UD might provide a useful objective clinical tool to aid in decision-making regarding the type of UD and postoperative medical care situation. Further prospective data are needed to confirm these findings and further simplify the methods used here.

show abstract

“…The Purdue Pegboard Test (Tiffin, 1968), Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (Surrey, et al, 2003), Box and Block Test (Mathiowetz, Volland, Kashman, & Weber, 1985), O'Connor Dexterity Test (Hines & O'Connor, 1926), and, more recently, the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT) (Aaron & Stegink Jansen, 2003) have all been administrated as part of dexterity and hand function studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the Variable Dexterity Test: Construction, reliability and validity

González

Rowson

Yoxall

2015

International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThis work introduces a dexterity test designed to assess individual types of dexterity utilised whilst carrying out activities of daily living (ADL). Validity and reliability studies for this new test were carried out and the results are shown in this article. METHODReliability and validity estimates were obtained from 24 healthy participants. Test-retest and Inter-rater reliability were assessed via ANOVA. The validity of the test was estimated correlating scores from the VDT with the participant's proficiency to complete each of 4 ADL as well as a gold-standard dexterity test RESULTS/FINDINGSThe test produces consistent results among a pilot group with both a single assessor (test-retest reliability) and multiple assessors (inter-rater reliability). Correlations between VDT scores and proficiency to perform ADL were found to be high for most of the subtests. Correlation between the scores from the Purdue Pegboard Test and the VDT was shown to be high. CONCLUSIONThe VDT proved to be a flexible, reliable, valid tool that approaches the problem of assessing dexterity focusing on activities of daily living for the pilot group. Validity and reliability estimates show encouraging values, proving that the VDT can be used as an accurate method to assess more than one type of dexterity.

show abstract

Development of the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT): Construction, validity, reliability, and normative data

Cited by 120 publications

References 7 publications

Bilek Düzeyi Sinir, Parmak Düzeyi Tendon/Kırık Yaralanmalı Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme Anketleri El Fonksiyon Testleri ile ilişkili midir

Bilek Düzeyi Sinir, Parmak Düzeyi Tendon/Kırık Yaralanmalı Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme Anketleri El Fonksiyon Testleri ile ilişkili midir

Cognitive Status and Functional Dexterity as Outcome Predictors Following Urinary Diversion: A Combined Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study

Development of the Variable Dexterity Test: Construction, reliability and validity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About