2015
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2014.2370101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Terminal Joint and Lead Extension for JT-60SA Central Solenoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore one joint of the CS model coil was disconnected and then reconnected before the test to demonstrate the repair process (figure 8(a)). All the joint resistances were in the range of 1.6-2 nΩ (see figure 8(b)), satisfying the requirement of less than 5 nΩ [12].…”
Section: Ef Coils and Csmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore one joint of the CS model coil was disconnected and then reconnected before the test to demonstrate the repair process (figure 8(a)). All the joint resistances were in the range of 1.6-2 nΩ (see figure 8(b)), satisfying the requirement of less than 5 nΩ [12].…”
Section: Ef Coils and Csmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The joint resistance of the Type A joint sample was 1.2 nΩ under the external field of 4 T, which fulfilled the design requirement, which was 5 nΩ. On the other hand, the joint resistance of the Type B joint sample was 16.8 nΩ even without the external field [26]. Consequently, the Type A joint was adopted as the CS terminal joint.…”
Section: Measurements Of Joint Resistancementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The Type B joint sample was disassembled to investigate a cause of high joint resistance of the sample. As a result, the contact between a Nb3Sn cable and copper spacer was poor because the configuration of the copper spacer was deformed owing to creep phenomenon during heat treatment [26].…”
Section: Measurements Of Joint Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%