2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00806-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of technique for observing pores in hardened cement paste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before mercury intrusion test, the samples were dried in an oven at about 110 °C until constant weight to remove moisture in the pores. MIP is based on the assumption that the non-wetting liquid mercury (the contact angle between mercury and solid is greater than 90°) will only intrude in the pores of porous material under pressure 46,47 . Each pore size is quantitatively determined from the relationship between the volume of intruded mercury and the applied pressure 47 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before mercury intrusion test, the samples were dried in an oven at about 110 °C until constant weight to remove moisture in the pores. MIP is based on the assumption that the non-wetting liquid mercury (the contact angle between mercury and solid is greater than 90°) will only intrude in the pores of porous material under pressure 46,47 . Each pore size is quantitatively determined from the relationship between the volume of intruded mercury and the applied pressure 47 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIP is based on the assumption that the non-wetting liquid mercury (the contact angle between mercury and solid is greater than 90°) will only intrude in the pores of porous material under pressure 46,47 . Each pore size is quantitatively determined from the relationship between the volume of intruded mercury and the applied pressure 47 . The relationship between the pore diameter and applied pressure is generally described by Washburn equation as follows 46,47 :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one should be aware of the fact that the porosity of OPC systems can be controlled through several means such as reduction in water-to-cementing materials ratio (w/cm) facilitated by the use of chemical admixtures, incorporation of other reactive ingredients and improved curing practices. The pore structure of OPC pastes provided here is only used as a point of comparison and not intended to derive quantitative conclusions regarding the pore structure of OPC systems, which can be found in several other publications [34][35][36][37]. Also, for the iron-based binder systems, the composition and curing conditions used are designed to provide the optimal microstructure and strength.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Pore Structures Of Iron Carbonate And Opc-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) is extensively used to characterize the pore structure in porous material as a result of its simplicity, quickness and wide measuring range of pore diameter 46,47 . MIP provides information about the connectivity of pores 46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before mercury intrusion test, the samples are dried in an oven at about 110 °C until constant weight to remove moisture in the pores. MIP is based on the assumption that the non-wetting liquid mercury (the contact angle between mercury and solid is greater than 90°) will only intrude in the pores of porous material under pressure 46,47 . Each pore size is quantitatively determined from the relationship between the volume of intruded mercury and the applied pressure 47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%