2018
DOI: 10.1017/s002237781800017x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of tearing instability in a current sheet forming by sheared incompressible flow

Abstract: Sweet-Parker current sheets in high Lundquist number plasmas are unstable to tearing, suggesting they will not form in physical systems. Understanding magnetic reconnection thus requires study of the stability of a current sheet as it forms. Formation can occur due to sheared, sub-Alfvénic incompressible flows which narrow the sheet. Standard tearing theory (Furth et al. 1963;Coppi et al. 1976;Rutherford 1973) is not immediately applicable to such forming sheets for two reasons: first, because the flow introdu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first establish that pressure anisotropy is produced during CS formation. For that, we adopt a simple local model for CS formation based on a one-dimensional generalization of the Chapman–Kendall solution (Chapman & Kendall 1963; Tolman, Loureiro & Uzdensky 2018, §2). A sheared magnetic field is frozen into an incompressible, time-independent fluid velocity , where and are constants describing the strengths of the reconnecting and guide components of , respectively, and is the characteristic CS-formation time scale.…”
Section: Prerequisitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first establish that pressure anisotropy is produced during CS formation. For that, we adopt a simple local model for CS formation based on a one-dimensional generalization of the Chapman–Kendall solution (Chapman & Kendall 1963; Tolman, Loureiro & Uzdensky 2018, §2). A sheared magnetic field is frozen into an incompressible, time-independent fluid velocity , where and are constants describing the strengths of the reconnecting and guide components of , respectively, and is the characteristic CS-formation time scale.…”
Section: Prerequisitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can occur if the current sheet is broken up into smaller pieces due to the formation of plasmoids as a result of the tearing instability. A stationary reconnecting current sheet is unstable to a fast tearing instability, or plasmoid instability above a critical value of the Lundquist number that is typically quoted as S S c = 10 4 (Loureiro et al 2007), leading to a reconnection rate of order 10 −2 v A (Samtaney et al 2009;Bhattacharjee et al 2009;Uzdensky et al 2010;Loureiro et al 2012;Huang & Bhattacharjee 2013;Murphy et al 2013;Comisso et al 2016;Comisso et al 2017;Tolman et al 2018). Special relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamic (SRRMHD) simulations have confirmed this critical value of the Lundquist number in relativistic plasmas with a uniform resistivity Zenitani et al 2010;Zanotti & Dumbser 2011;Takamoto 2013;Baty & Pétri 2013;Pétri et al 2014;Del Zanna et al 2016;Papini et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its perceived importance – from determining the reconnection rate in MHD plasmas to its possible role in the reconnection onset (Pucci & Velli 2014; Comisso et al. 2016; Uzdensky & Loureiro 2016; Tolman, Loureiro & Uzdensky 2018) and in the energy partition (Loureiro et al. 2012; Numata & Loureiro 2015) and particle acceleration and plasma heating (Drake et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental plasma physics phenomenon, relevant to laboratory, space and astrophysical systems (Biskamp 2000;Zweibel & Yamada 2009;Uzdensky 2011). It involves a rapid topological rearrangement of the magnetic field, leading to efficient magnetic energy conversion and dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%