2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63577-8.50036-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of sustainable CO2 conversion processes for the methanol production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For methanol production from CO 2 , the stand-alone dry-reforming-methanol synthesis process will emit more CO 2 than the input CO 2 due to the large amount of heat needed for reforming . For direct CO 2 hydrogenation, the large amount of H 2 required must be produced from renewable energy; otherwise, the process is infeasible.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Tools For The Co2 Value Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For methanol production from CO 2 , the stand-alone dry-reforming-methanol synthesis process will emit more CO 2 than the input CO 2 due to the large amount of heat needed for reforming . For direct CO 2 hydrogenation, the large amount of H 2 required must be produced from renewable energy; otherwise, the process is infeasible.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Tools For The Co2 Value Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several CO 2 capture technologies such as amine scrubbing, membrane separation, and physical adsorption are being investigated for industrial carbon capture. CCU can generate profits by utilizing CO 2 to make products that can be sold such as methanol 33 and dimethyl ether 34 or to enhance oil recovery. 7 However, many of the CCU pathways are neither profitable nor CO 2 -negative.…”
Section: ■ Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently 12 we have demonstrated that increasing CO 2 content in the feed to 35−40% reduces the economic benefits of CR for methanol production and increases the consumption of flue gas, and consequently, the CO 2 emission are larger. On the other hand, Roh et al 13 have demonstrated both that the economic benefits of a methanol plant based on CR can be enhanced and that the CO 2 emissions reduced by proper integration of a conventional autothermal methanol plant with another one based on CR. In an effort to upgrade the use of NG with a very high CO 2 content (>40%), as is found in certain gas fields in Argentina, 11 we have proposed and analyzed the technical and economic aspects of a modified CR process suitable for methanol production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently we have demonstrated that increasing CO 2 content in the feed to 35–40% reduces the economic benefits of CR for methanol production and increases the consumption of flue gas, and consequently, the CO 2 emission are larger. On the other hand, Roh et al . have demonstrated both that the economic benefits of a methanol plant based on CR can be enhanced and that the CO 2 emissions reduced by proper integration of a conventional autothermal methanol plant with another one based on CR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%