2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of surgical techniques of secondary osteoplasty in cleft patients following 12 years experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noticeable that the bone density in cancellous bone graft group is significantly higher than that in block bone graft group at 1- and 3-month postoperatively, as shown in Figure 3A. This result is not surprising because the particulate iliac bone is usually compressed in the alveolar cleft during surgery (Theologie-Lygidakis et al, 2014). However, no significant difference of the bone density was found at 6-month postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noticeable that the bone density in cancellous bone graft group is significantly higher than that in block bone graft group at 1- and 3-month postoperatively, as shown in Figure 3A. This result is not surprising because the particulate iliac bone is usually compressed in the alveolar cleft during surgery (Theologie-Lygidakis et al, 2014). However, no significant difference of the bone density was found at 6-month postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Block bone grafting technique is widely used for bone repairing and augmentation in radius and ulna (Barbieri et al, 1997), cranial wall (Cestari et al, 2009; Hwang et al, 2012), and oral cavity (Sjostrom et al, 2013; Fretwurst et al, 2015). Recently, this technique was applied for ABG in alveolar cleft patients with different modifications (Mikoya et al, 2010; Luque-Martin et al, 2014; Theologie-Lygidakis et al, 2014; Van Nhan et al, 2018). From the year of 2013, block iliac bone graft technique was approved at our center and was performed in older cleft patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor site of block bone could be iliac crest or mandible ( 16 , 17 ). Mandibular bone block could be less resorpted than that from iliac crest for it matched with the embryologic origin on craniofacial bone formation ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, block bone grafting technique has been widely used for bone augmentation in adults, with good long-term outcomes ( 13 , 14 ). The bone block could be trimmed to fit for the alveolar defect ( 15 ) or fixed with small titanium plates and screws ( 16 ). Recent studies reported on the use of block bone grafting in cleft patients of age window ( 17 , 18 ); however, for older alveolar cleft patients, this technique was rarely reported and the osseous outcomes of bone healing were not well investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting results have been found for the effects of cleft size (Long et al, 1995;Honma et al, 1999;Aurouze et al, 2000;Van der Meij et al, 2003;Feichtinger et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2008;Oberoi et al, 2009) and age (both biological and dental) (Van der Meij et al, 2001;Williams et al, 2003;Boyarskiy et al, 2006;Oberoi et al, 2009;Toscano et al, 2012) on graft success. Additional factors, heretofore not seriously considered as possible influences on bone graft success, are the type and timing of coordinated orthodontic treatment, both before and after bone grafting, which have become commonplace with most treatment protocols (Abyholm et al, 1981;Theologie-Lygidakis et al, 2014). Presurgical orthodontics plays an important role in correcting misaligned central incisors or repositioning displaced maxillary alveolar segments, which are not uncommon findings in the cleft maxilla.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%