1991
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90324-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of supernumerary premolars in an orthodontic population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lind, Horowitz, Rubenstein, Thongudomporn and Freer, Altug-Atac and Edrem, and Uslu et al reported the prevalence range of 0.3-3.6%. [10][11][12][13]16,17 This might be due to racial and ethnic differences. Previous studies stated that 90 to 98% of all supernumerary teeth were present in the maxilla and most commonly in the premaxilla region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lind, Horowitz, Rubenstein, Thongudomporn and Freer, Altug-Atac and Edrem, and Uslu et al reported the prevalence range of 0.3-3.6%. [10][11][12][13]16,17 This might be due to racial and ethnic differences. Previous studies stated that 90 to 98% of all supernumerary teeth were present in the maxilla and most commonly in the premaxilla region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Rubenstein et al evaluated the prevalence of supernumerary teeth in orthodontic patients to be 0.64%. 13 Rose found that 4.3% of the sample had at least one congenitally missing tooth. 14 A pilot twin study by Kotsomitis et al on 202 orthodontic patients reported a prevalence of 29.7% for ectopic eruption and 8.4% for hypodontia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted in Mexico on 2241 patients, Salcido-García et al (14) reported the prevalence of the premolars to be 1.7% whereas another study from USA, in which 1100 orthodontic patients were included, found the prevalence of supernumerary premolars to be 0.64% (12). In a study of 2599 Turkish children, Esenlik et al (15) reported the prevalence of the maxillary supernumerary premolars to be 0.2% and mandibular supernumerary premolars to be 0.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the prevalence of the supernumerary premolars (SP) in permanent dentition is between 0.075-0.26% and that supernumerary premolars account for only 10% of all the supernumerary cases (10). The difference of these teeth from the other supernumeraries is that they more commonly occur in the mandible (11)(12)(13). The number of supernumerary premolar teeth is usually one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maioria dos autores recomenda que os elementos supranumerários devam ser acompanhados e removidos posteriormente, quando as raízes estiverem mais desenvolvidas, evitando-se assim danos a estruturas adjacentes e permitindo uma melhor regeneração óssea 42,43,44 . Isso não está de acordo com Peterson et al 45 que recomendam a extração todo dente incluso assim que for diagnosticado.…”
Section: Descrição Do Caso Clínicounclassified