Laminar-Turbulent Transition 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79765-1_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Stationary Crossflow Vortices on a Swept Wing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stationary crossflow waves often show evidence of strong nonlinear effects [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Because the wavefronts are fixed with respect to the model and are nearly aligned with the local potential-flow direction (i.e.…”
Section: (D) Three-dimensional Boundary Layers: Crossflow Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stationary crossflow waves often show evidence of strong nonlinear effects [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Because the wavefronts are fixed with respect to the model and are nearly aligned with the local potential-flow direction (i.e.…”
Section: (D) Three-dimensional Boundary Layers: Crossflow Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason was attributed to the quick nonlinear saturation of the disturbance. This statement is basically true in the case of the experiment of Radeztsky et al (1994) [1], where the rms amplitude of the disturbance was already 7% of the local inviscid velocity at the edge of the boundary layer at the location x/c = 0.05, where x is the streamwise coordinate, c the cord length, see Fig.1. However, in a boundary layer, one can hardly say saturation in its strict sense, as the Reynolds number keeps changing in the streamwise direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, much attention have been paid for its investigation, both theoretically and experimentally. However, although local linear stability analysis did provide good results for predicting the shape of the crossflow vortices, the growth rate were usually much overpredicted, see for example Radeztsky et al (1994) [1], Reed et al (1996) [2] and Deyhle & Bippes (1996) [3]. The reason was attributed to the quick nonlinear saturation of the disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations