2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51493-2_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Sponge Structure and Casting Conditions for Absorbable Magnesium Bone Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further reasons for the more significant changes in shape and volume losses of p400 compared to p500, could be the rougher and somewhat larger surface area of p400 due to production. 54 A larger and more uneven surface displays a larger contact area of the implant material to the host tissue, which can result in a more rapid degradation. 29,55 A similar situation was described by Von der Höh et al, 56 who investigated Mg implants with different surface structures in rabbit femura.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further reasons for the more significant changes in shape and volume losses of p400 compared to p500, could be the rougher and somewhat larger surface area of p400 due to production. 54 A larger and more uneven surface displays a larger contact area of the implant material to the host tissue, which can result in a more rapid degradation. 29,55 A similar situation was described by Von der Höh et al, 56 who investigated Mg implants with different surface structures in rabbit femura.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, previous results have already shown that the maximum tolerable load within the elastic regime (858 N) of Mg-La2 implants is significantly lower than that of LAE442 implants (1608 N). 11,16 However, this lower value is still sufficient for the implant's location considered within the rabbit's tibia, as the bone is subjected to only a maximum load of 60 N there. 23,24 However, with respect to the degradation behavior, the difference between the alloys is much more crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the resulting open-pored Mg scaffolds showed sufficient strength for the envisaged application. 11,16 Apparently, an ideal scaffold would promote bone ingrowth behavior, provide sufficient mechanical strength, and degrade after a given time without leaving any critical elements within the body. The objective of the present study is to move one step ahead in this direction by studying three different Mg-based alloys under conditions relevant for the clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce the porous scaffolds, exact models of the scaffolds were created using the fused deposition modeling process with individual successive layers of wax on a 3D printer (Solidscape, Inc., Merrimack) (Julmi, Klose, Krüger, Wriggers, & Maier, 2017). For the following investment casting process, the resulting single wax cylinders were attached together to a model wax tree.…”
Section: Magnesium Alloy and Scaffold Structurementioning
confidence: 99%