2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00814.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of spatially diverse and complex dune‐field patterns: Gran Desierto Dune Field, Sonora, Mexico

Abstract: The pattern of dunes within the Gran Desierto of Sonora, Mexico, is both spatially diverse and complex. Identification of the pattern components from remote‐sensing images, combined with statistical analysis of their measured parameters demonstrate that the composite pattern consists of separate populations of simple dune patterns. Age‐bracketing by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) indicates that the simple patterns represent relatively short‐lived aeolian constructional events since ∼25 ka. The simple … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless restricted by some boundary conditions, the general trend in dune-field pattern evolution is constructive (i.e., toward fewer, larger, more widely spaced dunes), with interactions becoming less frequent as dunes migrate more slowly and become more distant from each other. Because any given wind regime produces one dune-field pattern (Kocurek and Ewing 2005), complex patterns, in which simple patterns are superimposed, provide a means for interpreting temporal changes in environmental parameters (e.g., Beveridge et al 2006, Derickson et al 2008. Because dune interactions create bounding surfaces and alter the secondary flow over dunes, it should be possible to identify these interactions in ancient eolian strata, thereby providing a new range of interpretation to the deterministic models of Rubin (1987).…”
Section: Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless restricted by some boundary conditions, the general trend in dune-field pattern evolution is constructive (i.e., toward fewer, larger, more widely spaced dunes), with interactions becoming less frequent as dunes migrate more slowly and become more distant from each other. Because any given wind regime produces one dune-field pattern (Kocurek and Ewing 2005), complex patterns, in which simple patterns are superimposed, provide a means for interpreting temporal changes in environmental parameters (e.g., Beveridge et al 2006, Derickson et al 2008. Because dune interactions create bounding surfaces and alter the secondary flow over dunes, it should be possible to identify these interactions in ancient eolian strata, thereby providing a new range of interpretation to the deterministic models of Rubin (1987).…”
Section: Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have summarized the physiographic, tectonic, and geologic setting of the Gran Desierto dune fi eld Blount and Lancaster, 1990;Beveridge et al, 2006;, which is important to understanding the possible sources of sediment to the dune fi eld. The Colorado River is the largest potential source of sand for the dunes (Merriam and Bandy, 1969).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By mapping the spatial distribution of mineralogy, especially quartz and feldspar, we update the only previous remotesensing study of the Gran Desierto ) with more accurate results. We compare the Gran Desierto dune fi eld to other geochemical studies of sands (e.g., KasperZubillaga et al, 2007) and place it in the context of other regional studies of dune fi elds of the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts (e.g., Zimbelman and Williams, 2002;Muhs, 2004) and geomorphic studies of Desierto dunes (e.g., Lancaster, 1992Lancaster, , 1995Beveridge et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many examples of studies using morphometric parameters to characterize the long-term dune field dynamics can be found (Beveridge et al, 2006;Bishop, 2010;Elbelrhiti et al, 2008;Ewing et al, 2006;Kocurek and Ewing, 2005). The classic planimetric discretization of landforms using points or lines is still the preferred methodology, even if it is recognized that it can be a highly subjective task whose results are not necessarily reproducible (Hugenholtz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%