Development of screening criteria for microplastic particles in air and atmospheric deposition: critical review and applicability towards assessing human exposure

Abstract

Over the last several years there has been an increase in studies reporting the presence of microplastic particles (MPs) in both indoor and outdoor air. Data reported reflect a variety of different types of air samples, which have helped to demonstrate the ubiquity of MPs in the atmosphere and their potential contribution to atmospheric particulate matter (PM). The relative quality of the data reporting on MPs in air has not been evaluated, but represents an important step towards improving our overall understanding of the human health implications in relation to inhalation exposure to MPs. Adopting recent approaches that have been proposed to assess the quality of data for those studies reporting concentrations in biota and water samples, we identify a suite of criteria used to screen studies reporting MPs in air for the purposes of evaluating their usefulness in assessing human exposure. Here we review and summarize data from 27 studies reporting MPs in various types of air samples and evaluate each of the studies against 11 separate criteria representing four main categories (sampling; contamination mitigation; sample purification / handling; characterization and application towards assessing human exposure). On average, studies scored 48.6% (range 18.2–81.8%) of the maximum score. Only one study received a positive score for all criteria, implying that there remains a need for future studies to consider strengthening implementation and reporting of QA/QC protocol. The most urgent areas requiring attention relate to the need for studies to avoid and verify background contamination and to strengthen the quantification of method recovery efficiencies. The majority of studies report data for particulates > 10 μm. Due to the associations between exposure to particles < 10 μm and human health effects, we recommend that prioritization efforts that develop standard protocols, based on existing air sampling methods capable of characterizing MPs < 10 μm are progressed.

Hide-and-seek: Threshold values and contribution towards better understanding of recovery rate in microplastic research

“…Still, consistency for recovery rates routine amongst studies would allow to compare and evaluate the quality of work. That would raise the concern that recovery rate results are not always reported [10 , 18 , 26 , 31] or they represent just part of the samples treatment protocol [12] .…”

Microplastics in the atmosphere: a review

“…Pauly et al [34] found fibers in 99 of 114 malignant lung specimens. On the other hand, a recent study indicated that MP deposition is more likely to occur in the upper airway tract (i.e., nose, mouth, and throat) when inhaled and would reach the gut if ingested [7,25] . Fine MPs are believed to translocate to the circulatory system and other organs [33,39] .…”

“…There are 48 studies (as of November 2021) reporting MPs in dust, aerosols, wet and dry atmospheric deposition, snow, etc. [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . MPs in the air are released from wear and tear of clothing material [27][28][29] , by washing and drying [30] , erosion of synthetic rubber tires, deterioration of house furniture, emissions from the synthetic textile industry, emissions from vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) industries, and contamination from city dust [18][19][20][21] [Figure 1].…”

Paradigms to assess the human health risks of nano- and microplastics

“…Chemical uptake then is modelled dynamically as a function of exchange rate constants, concentration gradients and gut retention time [102]. Like for analytical and effect studies [95], strict QA/QC criteria would apply to such 'vector effect' modelling studies, criteria which have been published recently [222].…”