Development of <scp>J</scp>apanese version of <scp>K</scp>ing's <scp>S</scp>tigma <scp>S</scp>cale and its short version: <scp>P</scp>sychometric properties of a self‐stigma measure

Mizuno, Masashi; Yamaguchi, Sosei; Taneda, Ayano; Hori, Hiroaki; Aikawa, Ayako; Fujii, Chiyo

doi:10.1111/pcn.12470

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This hypothesis may be observed, as items 11, 13, 17, and 26 showed a factor loading below 0.45 during the original validation and further adaptations (Ho et al, 2015;King et al, 2007;Mizuno et al, 2017;Morandi et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…This strategy revealed a consistent and growing body of works restricted to five instruments. However, we identified that the use of these instruments is sometimes incongruent with the original purposes of the measure (Mizuno et al, 2017;Vass, Sitko, West, & Bentall, 2017;Wood & Irons, 2017). First, SS seems to have items that could be interpreted as an assessment of more than one type of stigma.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Instruments for measuring perceived and experienced Mental Illness Stigma: A systematic review

Cardoso

Sanvicente‐Vieira

Ferracini

et al. 2020

PTP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to investigate which instruments are most utilized when measuring perceived and experienced mental illness stigma (MIS) in adults, and some of the variables that may moderate or interfere in measured outcomes, 101 published empirical and peer-reviewed studies were systematically extracted from electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). The results revealed that MIS is commonly evaluated by five scales. When considering the most tested and reported associative effects, age, and symptoms' severity were identified as potentially intervening variables. Other variables, such as sex, diagnostic, and treatment regimen (inpatient/outpatient) were evaluated by a few studies and presented inconsistent results. These findings suggest that future studies should use well-established instruments in the literature to assess MIS, as well as to aim for the cross-cultural adaptation of instruments that evaluate MIS since no instruments presented in this review are validated to the Brazilian population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instruments for measuring perceived and experienced Mental Illness Stigma: A systematic review

Cardoso

Sanvicente‐Vieira

Ferracini

et al. 2020

PTP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 3-factor solution of the SS was also found by other authors, using samples of patients with mental disorders from several different countries, such as Switzerland, 25 Iran, 26 Chine, 27 and Japan. 28 The items with acceptable loading in Disclosure (F1) corresponded almost completely to those of this factor in the original version, 7 except for three items that are part of Discrimination and that involve feelings of isolation/loneliness (item 11), feelings about the injustice of life (item 26) due to the fact of having a mental illness, and non-disclosure of mental health problems due to the fear of people's reactions (item 17).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Portuguese Version of the Stigma Scale: Preliminary Psychometric Characteristics

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Stigma is associated with poor prognosis of illness and reduced help-seeking behavior, self-esteem and treatment compliance. The aims of this study were to study the reliability and construct validity of the King’s et al Stigma Scale, and its association with Illness and Help-Seeking Behaviors scale (IHSBS) scores.Material and Methods: One hundred and forty mental health patients filled out the Stigma scale and the Illness and Help-Seeking Behaviors scale. The exploratory factor analysis of the stigma scale was performed, and its reliability studied. The correlation analysis was used and mean differences in Stigma Scale scores among IHSBS groups were explored.Results: The exploratory factor analysis indicated four factors (F): F1-Disclosure, F2-Discrimination, F3-Acceptance and F4-Personal Growth, which showed acceptable/good internal consistency (α from 0.70 to 0.91). Help-seeking behaviors were not associated with stigma. The levels of Discrimination were high in the group with global high-IHSB and in patients with medium/high illness behavior (IB) and health-related worries (HW). Additionally, Disclosure and overall stigma levels were higher in groups with high-HW and with medium-IB scores (when compared with the group with low-IB). The group with low-IB also had lower levels of Acceptance and Personal Growth when compared with the groups with medium-IB and high-IB, respectively.Conclusion: The Stigma Scale (27 items) is a valid, reliable instrument and useful tool to assess stigma in mental health patients.

show abstract

“…Observa-se assim a necessidade de realização de estudos brasileiros que investiguem os impactos das percepções e das experiências de EDM, dos indivíduos com doença mental, advindas dos familiares, do meio social e dos profissionais de saúde por meio de um instrumento (i.e., EEDM) bem estabelecido na literatura e utilizado em outros países (King et al, 2007;Meier et al, 2015;Mizuno et al, 2017;Reynoso et al, 2011;Sarkin et al, 2014) o qual começa a apresentar propriedades psicométricas promissoras no Brasil. Espera-se que este estudo contribua com o campo da Avaliação Psicológica no EDM, em especial, no desenvolvimento de pesquisas que investiguem a prevalência do EDM na população brasileira, para que estratégias de intervenção, em linha com o desenvolvimento de novas políticas públicas, sejam formuladas visando atender às demandas da Agenda Nacional de Prioridades de Pesquisa em Saúde (Brasil, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Adaptação Transcultural da The Stigma Scale para o Português Brasileiro: Estudo Piloto

Cardoso¹,

Sanvicente‐Vieira²,

Machado³

et al. 2020

Aval. Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

defendida em '2019' no programa de pós-graduação 'em psicologia' da 'Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. RESUMOO estigma da doença mental (EDM) é apontado como um agravante dos quadros de transtorno mental, sendo recomendada pelo ministério da saúde a realização de pesquisas que auxiliem na identificação e intervenção a esse fenômeno. Este estudo teve como objetivo realizar a adaptação transcultural da The Stigma Scale, para o português brasileiro e verificar seus parâmetros psicométricos preliminares. O método deste estudo foi estruturado em cinco etapas: 1. obtenção da permissão para adaptação; 2. tradução do instrumento; 3. síntese e avaliação por especialistas; 4. retrotradução e avaliação por especialistas; 5. estudo piloto. A versão brasileira da The Stigma Scale foi aplicada em 23 pacientes psiquiátricos. O instrumento apresentou boas evidências de validade de conteúdo (k=0,81) e consistência interna (α=0,87). Os participantes do estudo piloto não reportaram dificuldades relacionadas à compreensão dos itens. Os autores originais da The Stigma Scale aprovaram a versão brasileira do instrumento. Palavras-chave: tradução; validação; estigma da doença mental; saúde mental.ABSTRACT -Transcultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese of the Stigma Scale: a pilot study Mental illness stigma (MIS) has been indicated to be an aggravating factor for mental disorders, therefore, the national department of health recommends the performance of research that seeks to assist in the identification of this condition and suggest intervention strategies. This study aimed to perform the transcultural adaption to Brazilian Portuguese of the Stigma Scale and to verify its preliminary psychometric parameters. The methodology used was structured in five steps: 1. obtaining permission to adapt; 2. translation of the instrument; 3. synthesis and evaluation by specialists; 4. back-translation and specialist evaluation; and 5. a pilot study. The Brazilian version of The Stigma Scale presented good content validity (k=0.81) and internal consistency (α=0.87). The pilot study sample did not report difficulties related to the understanding of the items. The original authors of the Stigma Scale approved the Brazilian version of the instrument.

show abstract

Development of Japanese version of King's Stigma Scale and its short version: Psychometric properties of a self‐stigma measure

Abstract: Both Japanese versions of King's Stigma Scale can be utilized depending on their intended use.

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Instruments for measuring perceived and experienced Mental Illness Stigma: A systematic review

Instruments for measuring perceived and experienced Mental Illness Stigma: A systematic review

Portuguese Version of the Stigma Scale: Preliminary Psychometric Characteristics

Adaptação Transcultural da The Stigma Scale para o Português Brasileiro: Estudo Piloto

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About