2010
DOI: 10.1080/10669868.2010.534020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Russian Oil and Gas Regimes Focusing on the Shtokman Field: Institutional Drivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shtokman had a particularly high profile in Norway, with its promise of rapid industrial growth in the northern regions and closer Norwegian-Russian ties (see Overland 2008;Mineev 2010;Moe, Fjaertoft and Overland 2011;Godzimirski 2007). As Jensen and Overland (2011) see it, however, scholars and commentators have overlooked the role of Total, not least in the public debate in Norway, where the Shtokman field was portrayed almost as if it were solely a Norwegian-Russian project.…”
Section: Shtokman In the Russian Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shtokman had a particularly high profile in Norway, with its promise of rapid industrial growth in the northern regions and closer Norwegian-Russian ties (see Overland 2008;Mineev 2010;Moe, Fjaertoft and Overland 2011;Godzimirski 2007). As Jensen and Overland (2011) see it, however, scholars and commentators have overlooked the role of Total, not least in the public debate in Norway, where the Shtokman field was portrayed almost as if it were solely a Norwegian-Russian project.…”
Section: Shtokman In the Russian Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%