2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2000.tb00926.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of routine RT‐PCR tests for certification of fruit tree multiplication material*

Abstract: Current developments in certification procedures for propagating material require the availability of rapid, sensitive, reliable and user-friendly detection protocols applicable for routine testing. Our research concerns the possible use of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the detection of the pathogens listed for virus-tested pome and stonefruit propagating material in Belgium. Although RT-PCR satisfies the need for rapidity and sensitivity, the usual protocols relying on the use o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is particularly interesting for PDV and PNRSV as they are often present in mixed infections and their absence has to be controlled in phytosanitary certification programmes. A duplex protocol, based on primer pairs published by Kummert et al (2000), was previously optimized for the simultaneous detection of both viruses. The polyvalence of the primers was evaluated at the FUSAGx laboratory on 63 isolates of PDV and 101 isolates of PNRSV, respectively (Kummert et al 2000;Massart et al, unpublished data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is particularly interesting for PDV and PNRSV as they are often present in mixed infections and their absence has to be controlled in phytosanitary certification programmes. A duplex protocol, based on primer pairs published by Kummert et al (2000), was previously optimized for the simultaneous detection of both viruses. The polyvalence of the primers was evaluated at the FUSAGx laboratory on 63 isolates of PDV and 101 isolates of PNRSV, respectively (Kummert et al 2000;Massart et al, unpublished data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR assay was simplified using crude plant extracts (MARINHO et al 1998;KUMMERT et al 1998KUMMERT et al , 2000KUMMERT et al , 2001. Samples (bark or leaves) were ground in an extraction buffer, diluted and added directly into the PCR mix.…”
Section: The Samples Processing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, two duplex reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR methods, optimised (Massart et al, 2008) with previously published primers (Kummert et al, 2000), were evaluated. These methods were designed to detect four different fruit tree viruses belonging to the genus Ilarvirus (Apple mosaic virus, ApMV), Capillovirus (Apple stem grooving virus, ASGV), Trichovirus (Apple chlorotic leafspot virus, ACLSV) and Foveavirus (Apple stem pitting virus, ASPV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%