2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0131-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of restructured chicken block utilizing gizzard and its refrigerated storage stability

Abstract: A study was planned to develop restructured chicken product by incorporating optimum level of gizzard and fat and evaluate their quality attributes under refrigerated storage condition (4 ± 10 C). Incorporation of gizzard did not show any change in pH, but cooking yield reduced significantly (P < 0.05) at 40% level. There was a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in fat content and increase in protein and ash content with increase in the level of gizzard in the formulation. Significant (P < 0.05) improvement in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
15
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with the findings of Reddy and Rao (1997), Nag et al (1998), Singh and Verma (2000), Chidanandaiah et al (2009), Reddy et al (2009, Modi et al (2009), Kumar and Tanwar (2010), Sudheer et al (2010) and Bhat et al (2010) who also found a similar increase in TBARS values upon storage of different meat products.…”
Section: Free Fatty Acids (% Oleic Acid)supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was in agreement with the findings of Reddy and Rao (1997), Nag et al (1998), Singh and Verma (2000), Chidanandaiah et al (2009), Reddy et al (2009, Modi et al (2009), Kumar and Tanwar (2010), Sudheer et al (2010) and Bhat et al (2010) who also found a similar increase in TBARS values upon storage of different meat products.…”
Section: Free Fatty Acids (% Oleic Acid)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean values of the psychrophilic count increased significantly (P<0.05) throughout the storage period which was in agreement with the findings of Rao and Reddy (2000), Chidanandaiah et al (2009), Sudheer et al (2010 and Bhat et al (2010) who also observed a similar increase in psychrophilic count in various meat products during refrigerated storage.…”
Section: Total Plate Count (Log 10 Cfu/g)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…A gradual increase in psychrophilic counts during storage of chicken products had also been reported by Sen and Sharma (1996), Nag et al (1998), Chidanandiah et al (2009), Sudheer et al (2010 and Bhat et al (2010).…”
Section: Microbiological Characterssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar results were reported by Conca and Yang (1993), Kester and Fennema (1986), Krochta et al (1994) and Earle and McKee (1985) and Chidanandiah et al (2009) (Brewer et al 1992) that led to lipid oxidation. Dushyanthan et al (2000), Kumar and Sharma (2004), Chidanandiah et al (2009), Modi et al (2009, Kumar and Tanwar (2010), Sudheer et al (2010) and Bhat et al (2010) who also found a similar increase in TBARS values upon storage of different meat products.…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Lower cook yield and correspondingly lower moisture of the cooked samples were obtained at 100°C than at 70°C (Arganosa et al 1991). Highly acceptable restructured chicken block was developed with incorporation of gizzard and fat and with shelf life of 10 days under refrigerated storage condition (Sudheer et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%