2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of reproducible histologic injury severity scores: Skeletal muscle reperfusion injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a myriad of experimental ways to evaluate outcomes in I/R injury, including measures of histological evaluation, mitochondrial markers, and enzymatic activity [29]. We recently described a new statistical method of quantification through histology and used this method of evaluation in the current study [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a myriad of experimental ways to evaluate outcomes in I/R injury, including measures of histological evaluation, mitochondrial markers, and enzymatic activity [29]. We recently described a new statistical method of quantification through histology and used this method of evaluation in the current study [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injured fibers displayed broken or ragged borders, a heterogeneous texture, the presence of intracellular holes, and/or detached nuclei. An injury score was obtained for each muscle by dividing the number of injured fibers by the total number of fibers for a given muscle, once a statistically significant number of fibers had been evaluated according to previously described criteria (600 myocytes per sample) [24].…”
Section: Local Injury-skeletal Muscle Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Determination of injury score. The injury score (IS) was determined by a protocol based on that which has been established by McCormack et al 26 Four random photomicrographs were taken of each H&E-stained section, and based on the proportion of injured cells (defined by ragged cellular borders, vacuolization, lymphocytic infiltration, or rhabdomyolysis), blinded reviewers assigned a numerical value between 0 and 10 for each in vivo experiment. Values are presented as mean Ϯ standard error of the mean.…”
Section: Hs Donor Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful experimental therapies for skeletal muscle ischemia reperfusion have reliably demonstrated significant decrease in mediators of inflammation and decreased muscle fiber injury [32,36]. The methods used to analyze skeletal muscle injury in these experiments has provided reproducible quantitative analysis of muscle tissue injury [34], but there is no consensus in the literature regarding the best technique to quantitate muscle injury following reperfusion [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random number generator was used to create a random series of image numbers, which a blinded observer used to retrieve the respective images and count muscle fibers. A total of 1200 muscle fibers per gastrocnemius sample (i.e., limb) were counted and scored as uninjured or injured based on the morphology of the individual fibers [34]. Uninjured fibers were characterized as having well-defined borders, consistent texture, and morphological uniformity without holes or breaks, with easily identifiable satellite cells and pericellular nuclei.…”
Section: Histology and Assessment Of Muscle Fiber Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%