2021
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/796/1/012033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Regression Model to Predicting Yield Strength for Different Steel Grades

Abstract: Yield strength of steel is an important property in designing a steel component. The maximum load that material can sustain without undergoing permanent deformation is represented by yield strength. A robust model is purposed, which can accurately predict the yield strength of different steel grades, based on the varying chemical composition of steel from the employed database. The dataset consisting of chemical composition and experimental yield strength of steel rods from a collapsed building sites. MATLAB® … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In benchmark tests, PGCN outperformed other ML models for all HCV variants (Figure 2A), achieving more than 90% test accuracy for all datasets, including the combined dataset. We evaluated PGCN performance using different metrics besides accuracy, including F1 score, Precision, Recall, Area under curve (AUC), and Average Precision (AP), all standard evaluation metrics for machine learning tasks with imbalanced data [47][48][49][50] . PGCN had the highest F1, Recall, and AP scores of the benchmarked methods (example: 93.53% F1, 90.44% Recall, 96.05% AP for A171T protease using sequence features only) (see details in Table S2).…”
Section: Pgcn Performs Better Than Baseline ML Models For Hcv Proteas...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In benchmark tests, PGCN outperformed other ML models for all HCV variants (Figure 2A), achieving more than 90% test accuracy for all datasets, including the combined dataset. We evaluated PGCN performance using different metrics besides accuracy, including F1 score, Precision, Recall, Area under curve (AUC), and Average Precision (AP), all standard evaluation metrics for machine learning tasks with imbalanced data [47][48][49][50] . PGCN had the highest F1, Recall, and AP scores of the benchmarked methods (example: 93.53% F1, 90.44% Recall, 96.05% AP for A171T protease using sequence features only) (see details in Table S2).…”
Section: Pgcn Performs Better Than Baseline ML Models For Hcv Proteas...mentioning
confidence: 99%