DOI: 10.25148/etd.fi14110757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Presumptive and Confirmatory Analytical Methods for the Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Improvised Explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these techniques provide on-site detection, they are not multiplexed, and multiple tests must be performed to analyze an unknown explosive. Other drawbacks include inability to detect perchlorate, requirement of liquid reagents, and possibility of spilling before use [89].…”
Section: Iii-colorimetric and Immunoassay-based Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While these techniques provide on-site detection, they are not multiplexed, and multiple tests must be performed to analyze an unknown explosive. Other drawbacks include inability to detect perchlorate, requirement of liquid reagents, and possibility of spilling before use [89].…”
Section: Iii-colorimetric and Immunoassay-based Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common inorganic compound of most explosive mixtures, namely nitrates (NO 3 − ), can be used to detect explosives using analytical methods. The detection of explosives containing oxidizers, e.g., perchlorates (ClO 4 − ), chlorates (ClO 3 − ) or peroxides (O 2 − ), is a more complicated procedure [89]. Since these materials possess a wide range of properties (e.g., various composition, volatility, and polarity properties), a variety of analytical methods can used to identify the associated explosives.…”
Section: Confirmatory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations