2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Pre-Service Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Geometric Thinking Levels Through an Undergraduate Geometry Course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the research of Supriadi (2017) on the analysis the mathematical thinking process of primary school pre-service teachers, primary teaching education students, and primary school students have similarity, that is they like the routine mathematical thinking process and vertical thinking process or the traditional logical thinking process and mathematical by collecting and using relevant information. Other findings regarding the ability to think accordingly (Bulut& Bulut , 2012), the results of this study reveal the need for an assessment about development pre-service elementary mathematics teachers through their geometric thinking levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Based on the research of Supriadi (2017) on the analysis the mathematical thinking process of primary school pre-service teachers, primary teaching education students, and primary school students have similarity, that is they like the routine mathematical thinking process and vertical thinking process or the traditional logical thinking process and mathematical by collecting and using relevant information. Other findings regarding the ability to think accordingly (Bulut& Bulut , 2012), the results of this study reveal the need for an assessment about development pre-service elementary mathematics teachers through their geometric thinking levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Patkin and Barkai [32] also expected that TTPE students should reach the informal deduction level at the end of their studies. According to Balut [37] the third level of geometric thinking (informal deduction) is insufficient for these students and that it would be appropriate for them to reach at least the formal deduction level.…”
Section: The Van Hiele Geometric Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was carried out to the 4th-semester PGSD students who joined the geometry course and had passed two subjects; basic mathematical concepts and advanced mathematical concepts. Earlier in the 1st and 2nd semester, they had obtained a study of geometry including definitions, proofs, and examples of basic geometric concepts (Bulut & Bulut, 2012), especially in flat, space, and transformation geometry. Then, in the 4th semester, they had learned geometry learning strategies in elementary schools starting from curriculum review, learning steps, and learning media to assessments of elementary geometry learning.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%