2015 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices &Amp; IC's (ISPSD) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.2015.7123444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of power semiconductors by quantitative nanoscale dopant imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and Eq. 3 [ 57 ]. A much longer decay of the surface potential was also observed by M. Gao et al in locally resolved secondary electron emission measurements across a SiC p / n-junction [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 and Eq. 3 [ 57 ]. A much longer decay of the surface potential was also observed by M. Gao et al in locally resolved secondary electron emission measurements across a SiC p / n-junction [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach for such devices is the so-called junction barrier Schottky (JBS) rectifier-architecture, where highly doped p + -regions are embedded into the active device area to shield the Schottky contact from high electric fields and to handle surge-current events at the same time [ 59 – 60 ]. The implantation of dopants as well as the electronic properties of these embedded shields is a key property and needs sophisticated characterization [ 57 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the enhancement of device integration and the reduction in feature size to < 3 nm, there is an urgent need for a doping profiling technique with high resolution and high sensitivity. 3,4 Currently, capacitancevoltage profiling, 5,6 secondary ion mass spectrometry, 7,8 spreading resistance profiling, 9,10 scanning tunnelling microscopy 11 and electron holography 12 are often used for doping profiling. However, these techniques are more or less suffer from low spatial resolution, low accuracy, poor limit of detection, low throughput, time consuming, or high cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%