2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of peptidomimetic boronates as proteasome inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding mode of 3 c, 3 d, and 4 a was similar to that of previously published proteasome inhibitor 1 [6] and bortezomib. [13] As depicted in Figure 2, the inhibitors were found to adopt a b conformation and to fill the gap between strands S2 and S4 by forming H-bonds with residues T21 and G47, and for 4 a only, A49 of the b5 subunit.…”
Section: Docking Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The binding mode of 3 c, 3 d, and 4 a was similar to that of previously published proteasome inhibitor 1 [6] and bortezomib. [13] As depicted in Figure 2, the inhibitors were found to adopt a b conformation and to fill the gap between strands S2 and S4 by forming H-bonds with residues T21 and G47, and for 4 a only, A49 of the b5 subunit.…”
Section: Docking Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Coupling reactions between corresponding acids 13 a-p, obtained by alkaline hydrolysis, and pinanediol leucine boronate (14) [6] in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC·HCl), hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt), and N,Ndiisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) afforded pinanediol esters 15 ap (Scheme 2), which were employed without any further purification in the transesterification reaction with isobutylboronic acid under acid conditions to provide desired boronic acids 2-4.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GOLD allows a user-definable number of GA runs per ligand, each of which starts from a different orientation. For these experiments, the number of GA runs was set to 200 without the option of early termination, and scoring of the docked poses was performed with the original ChemPLP scoring function followed by rescoring with ChemScore [36][37][38][39][40]. The final receptor-ligand complex for each ligand was chosen interactively by selecting the highest scoring pose that was consistent with experimentally-derived information about the binding mode of the ligand.…”
Section: Docking Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%