1990
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci0701_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Numberline and Measurement Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
22

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
83
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the Piagetians argued that meaningful measurement and indirect comparison using transitive reasoning is impossible until children conserve length. However, children do not necessarily need to develop conservation before they can learn some measurement ideas (Clements, 1999;Hiebert, 1981;Petitto, 1990). Thus, children have an intuitive understanding on which to base reasoning about distance and length, but that reasoning develops over years, possibly requiring specific educational experiences to build concepts and skills that enable children to (1) align endpoints (Piaget et al, 1960), (2) use a third object and transitivity to compare the length of two objects that cannot be compared directly (Hiebert, 1981), (3) place length units along objects to find their lengths and associate higher counts with longer objects (Hiebert, 1981;Stephan, Bowers, Cobb, & Gravemeijer, 2003), (4) understand the need for equal-length units (Ellis, Siegler, & Van Voorhis, 2003), (5) use rulers accurately and meaningfully (Lehrer, 2003;Stephan et al, 2003), and (6) make inferences about the relative size of objects (e.g., if the number of units are the same, but the units are different, the total size is different) (Nunes & Bryant, 1996).…”
Section: Original Length Learning Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the Piagetians argued that meaningful measurement and indirect comparison using transitive reasoning is impossible until children conserve length. However, children do not necessarily need to develop conservation before they can learn some measurement ideas (Clements, 1999;Hiebert, 1981;Petitto, 1990). Thus, children have an intuitive understanding on which to base reasoning about distance and length, but that reasoning develops over years, possibly requiring specific educational experiences to build concepts and skills that enable children to (1) align endpoints (Piaget et al, 1960), (2) use a third object and transitivity to compare the length of two objects that cannot be compared directly (Hiebert, 1981), (3) place length units along objects to find their lengths and associate higher counts with longer objects (Hiebert, 1981;Stephan, Bowers, Cobb, & Gravemeijer, 2003), (4) understand the need for equal-length units (Ellis, Siegler, & Van Voorhis, 2003), (5) use rulers accurately and meaningfully (Lehrer, 2003;Stephan et al, 2003), and (6) make inferences about the relative size of objects (e.g., if the number of units are the same, but the units are different, the total size is different) (Nunes & Bryant, 1996).…”
Section: Original Length Learning Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis on paths and movement might help students focus on intervals or line segments as units of length, instead of on points (Cannon, 1992). Further, connections between mathematical symbols and graphics may promote in students a belief in the necessity of equal-interval units, another significant conceptual advance (Petitto, 1990). In addition, these connections may help students build mental connections between numerical and geometric ideas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number line is central to the LMR curriculum, we are able to build on and contribute to literatures in the learning sciences on children's developing understandings of the number line [Booth & Siegler, 2008;Earnest, 2012;Petitto, 1990;Saxe, Earnest, Sitabkhan, Haldar, Lewis, & Zheng, 2010;Siegler & Opfer, 2003] as well as linear representations [Barrett, Sarama, Clements, Cullen, McCool, Witkowski-Rumsey, & Klanderman, 2012;Lehrer, 2003;Núñez, 2011;Piaget & Inhelder, 1956;Piaget, Inhelder, & Szeminska, 1960;Saxe, Shaughnessy, Gearhart, & Haldar, 2013b]. As a whole, these literatures reveal that young children show capabilities to order numbers along a linear dimension; however, only later do children show capabilities to generate uniform metric properties in their ordering of numbers.…”
Section: The Lmr Curriculum Unit and Its Register Of Mathematical Defmentioning
confidence: 99%