2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of novel hydrocyclone designs for improved fines classification using multiphase CFD model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Three kinds of hydrocyclones are designed to improve the particle separation efficiency, and the optimum separation structure is determined by studying the pressure and velocity distribution inside a hydrocyclone [8]. The effect of cone angle structure on the classification of fine particles [9] and of the inlet angle, cylinder height, and inner cone on separation [10,11] are discussed. In addition, studies are conducted on the separation results with hydrocyclones of diverse structures and different working conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three kinds of hydrocyclones are designed to improve the particle separation efficiency, and the optimum separation structure is determined by studying the pressure and velocity distribution inside a hydrocyclone [8]. The effect of cone angle structure on the classification of fine particles [9] and of the inlet angle, cylinder height, and inner cone on separation [10,11] are discussed. In addition, studies are conducted on the separation results with hydrocyclones of diverse structures and different working conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was already proved that the usage of k‐ε model limited due to isotropic turbulence assumption, that is, equality of Reynolds stresses in all directions . This has led some of the researchers to use the differential Reynolds stress turbulence model to model the turbulence in hydrocyclones. However, some recent studies have shown that the large eddy simulation (LES) technique has given better flow field predictions over Reynolds averaged turbulence models in hydrocyclones with computationally practical grids.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, structural grids are not well applicable for complicated flow field models. On the contrary, non-structural grids are applicable for any flow field model [21,22], although the calculation is usually time consuming and the accuracy is limited. In flow field models of four product hydrocyclones, the hexahedron structural grid was applied on a hydrocyclone column, while a non-structural grid was applied for feeding inlets and boundaries.…”
Section: Modelling Of Four Product Hydrocyclonementioning
confidence: 99%