2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of novel and sensitive methods for the determination of sulfide in aqueous samples by hydrogen sulfide generation-inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6) A comparison between the analytical characteristics of the proposed method and literature methods for H 2 S determination is summarized in Table 1. It can be seen that our method has a higher sensitivity than electrochemistry [12], ICP-AES [14], CL method [16], and fluorescence method [37]. Its sensitivity is slightly lower than that of the reported HGAFS technique, but the proposed method is more simple than the HGAFS method [38].…”
Section: Detection Of H 2 Scontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) A comparison between the analytical characteristics of the proposed method and literature methods for H 2 S determination is summarized in Table 1. It can be seen that our method has a higher sensitivity than electrochemistry [12], ICP-AES [14], CL method [16], and fluorescence method [37]. Its sensitivity is slightly lower than that of the reported HGAFS technique, but the proposed method is more simple than the HGAFS method [38].…”
Section: Detection Of H 2 Scontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, H 2 S is an important molecule involved in many biological processes, and various techniques have been developed for determination of H 2 S concentrations in different samples. Some of the common H 2 S determination methods include electrochemistry [12,13], inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [14], gas chromatography [15], chemiluminescence (CL) methods [16], colorimetry [17], and the methylene blue assay [18]. These methods provide excellent performance, but they are generally complicated, costly, and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the presented sulfide enrichment/determination method, the others show some limitations in the limit of detection, 19,20,38−44 linear dynamic range, 20,42 and the range of the sample analyzed. 19,20,38,40,41,43,44 …”
Section: Comparison With the Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In environmental waters, decomposition of organic matter and the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria lead to the formation of hydrogen sulfide (Patnaik 1999;Yao and Millero 1996). This gas is a very important pollution index for water (Colon et al 2008). It exists naturally in crude petroleum, natural gas, hot springs and foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%