2007
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of novel agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection: Summary of the FDA Antiviral Products Advisory Committee recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among adverse events possibly or probably related to thymalfasin, most were mild and resolved without sequelae, and only one (nipple pain) occurred in 10% or more of thymalfasin-treated patients. These results are consistent with those of previous clinical studies, in which thymalfasin has been shown to have an excellent safety profile [32,[45][46][47][48]. When evaluating new agents for HCC, it is crucial to determine that they do not worsen outcomes and survival due to associated toxicity, compared with placebo or existing treatments [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Among adverse events possibly or probably related to thymalfasin, most were mild and resolved without sequelae, and only one (nipple pain) occurred in 10% or more of thymalfasin-treated patients. These results are consistent with those of previous clinical studies, in which thymalfasin has been shown to have an excellent safety profile [32,[45][46][47][48]. When evaluating new agents for HCC, it is crucial to determine that they do not worsen outcomes and survival due to associated toxicity, compared with placebo or existing treatments [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The regulatory decision-making process is based on the strength of data rather than theoretical considerations of benefi t. Important lessons from the HIV drug development arena will infl uence regulatory decisions with regard to HCV and include 1) the co-development of drugs in rational combinations (different mechanism of action and resistance profi les) makes sense and should be encouraged; 2) durability of response and tolerability of regimens are important; 3) concepts of resistance and cross-resistance for a class must be evaluated; and 4) the need for development and validation of biomarkers that are predictive of clinical benefi t. Unfortunately, no written guidelines from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently exist to guide HCV drug development, although there was one communication from an FDA advisory committee meeting in 2006 [30]. The result is a chaotic and unpredictable development paradigm for the many agents under clinical development.…”
Section: Regulatory Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The FDA considers HIV/HCV co-infected patients as a special population for HCV drug development and mandates studies addressing drug–drug interactions and safety [24]. At this time, clinicians must make treatment intervention decisions without availability of complete data regarding background ART interactions with the approved DAAs.…”
Section: First-generation Direct-acting Antivirals (Daas)mentioning
confidence: 99%