2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of new testing procedures to measure propped fracture conductivity considering water damage in clay-rich shale reservoirs: An example of the Barnett Shale

Abstract: Multi-stage hydraulic fracturing is the key to the success of many shale gas and shale oil reservoirs. The main objective of hydraulic fracturing in shale is to create fracture networks with sufficient fracture conductivity. Due to the variation in shale mineralogical and mechanical properties, fracture conductivity damage mechanisms in shale formations are complex. Standard fracture conductivity measurement procedures developed for fractures with high proppant concentration had to be modified to measure the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, transient tests were conducted to measure the permeability to CO 2 at different pressures. The permeability values were calculated using Equations (5) and (6) [35], where a pressure difference between upstream and downstream less than 0.2 MPa is adopted to reduce the influence of pore pressure on permeability:…”
Section: Permeability Testing Under Transient Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, transient tests were conducted to measure the permeability to CO 2 at different pressures. The permeability values were calculated using Equations (5) and (6) [35], where a pressure difference between upstream and downstream less than 0.2 MPa is adopted to reduce the influence of pore pressure on permeability:…”
Section: Permeability Testing Under Transient Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water-based fracturing fluids are currently used, but the combination of water and shale matrix with strong water imbibition results in severe formation damage. The softening effect caused by the imbibition of water can lead to strength reduction of fracture surfaces, and large deformation of fracture surfaces greatly reduces its self-propping potential and increases the embedment depth of proppants, which greatly compress the fracture width and may even close the fracture completely [4,5]. The imbibition of water into the shale matrix easily causes a blocking effect in tiny pore throats, which closes the channels for gas transport from the shale matrix to the created fractures [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shale and proppant properties combined control the propped fracture conductivity along with the closure stress. , When the proppant load is low, the conductivity is mainly controlled by the shale properties. Contrary to the high proppant load, the proppant characteristics become more important in determining the fracture conductivity. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slick‐water damage directly influences the exploitation of shale reservoirs. Therefore, the overall operation tendency of shale fracturing is to reduce the slick‐water damage to the reservoirs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the overall operation tendency of shale fracturing is to reduce the slick-water damage to the reservoirs. [23][24][25] The current practice is to reduce the molecular weight of PAM before flowing back. It is believed that a low molecular weight chain is fit to recover the permeability of shale reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%