2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682641/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of new microplastic reference particles for usage in pre-defined numbers

Simon D.J. Oster,
Paul E. Bräumer,
Daniel Wagner
et al.

Abstract: For almost two decades now, scientists have increasingly focused on the occurrence of microplastics in the environment and their impact on environmental and human health. Currently, the variety of analytical methods used in microplastic research result in data of different quality and resolution. This largely hampers comparability between data sets and consequently prevents a reliable risk assessment. In this context, the lack of suitable reference microplastic particles that can be added as internal standard … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 We solved the problem of weighing by using precisely cut, volume-defined particles out of our plastic standard materials and used these for lower limit calibration. 26 The lower limit of calibration was linear for PE (R 2 = 0.98), PET (R 2 = 0.93), and PS (R 2 = 0.92) and stayed in accordance with Dierkes et al who reported an R 2 of 0.98 for PE and 0.99 for PS using a calibration range from 0.005 to 10 mg in a Py-GC-MS system. 23 Method Development�Comparison of Plastic Specific Signals to Organic Materials.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 We solved the problem of weighing by using precisely cut, volume-defined particles out of our plastic standard materials and used these for lower limit calibration. 26 The lower limit of calibration was linear for PE (R 2 = 0.98), PET (R 2 = 0.93), and PS (R 2 = 0.92) and stayed in accordance with Dierkes et al who reported an R 2 of 0.98 for PE and 0.99 for PS using a calibration range from 0.005 to 10 mg in a Py-GC-MS system. 23 Method Development�Comparison of Plastic Specific Signals to Organic Materials.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For production of standard plastic particles, a protocol from Oster et al was used. 26 Injection-molded polymer blocks made of LD-PE, PET, and PS were cut into rectangular pieces (10 × 10 × 4 mm 3 ). These were then processed using a CNC mill (CMX 600 V; DMG MORI Inc., Bielefeld, Germany) to create columns on a baseplate with the intended diameter of the particles.…”
Section: Plastic Materials and Reference Compounds Formentioning
confidence: 99%