Abstract:ObjectivesCore competencies are considered the foundation for establishing Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) and paramedic curricula, and for ensuring performance standards in the delivery of prehospital care. This study surveyed EMT instructors and medical directors to identify the most desirable core competencies for all levels of EMTs in Taiwan.MethodsA principal components analysis with Varimax rotation was conducted. An online questionnaire was distributed to obtain perspectives of EMT instructors and me… Show more
“…The synthesis combines information from focused assessments that are here separated, yet in EMS professionals' minds, they tend to overlap. The main assessment is focused on child or adult patients [42], and their various medical conditions and problems [31,33,37 2), participant who did not state their profession (n = 4) The behavioral rating system includes one relevant categorygathering information. It is comprised of three elements and associated markers: conducting a risk assessment of the scene and ensuring it is safe to approach the patient before proceeding (e.g., noting any environmental hazards to self and the patient, stating the decision to approach the patient or not), reviewing decisions to ensure they are still appropriate requesting a second opinion from others (e.g., discussing alternative suggestions, stating the final decision), and trying alternative options when a certain approach is not working (e.g., stating alternative approach/intervention to be tried, beginning to use new approach/intervention).…”
Section: Situation Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be valuable sources of information to manage the emergency situation to a satisfying conclusion. It also emerged that it was crucial for those in a high-risk EMS profession to assess the environment and the safety of patients, bystanders, and personnel on scene and in the ambulance [31,33,34,38,40,41,47,48,55,57]. This means assessing clues and significant objects in the environment that can give a notion of what happens and to assess potential risks and threats.…”
Section: Situation Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the collected information, EMS crew members made interpretations that are part of their mental model of the call. Although making good interpretations of patient's medical conditions is considered to be one of the required attributes [42,57], it is critical to evaluate findings while discriminating between relevant and irrelevant data, avoid premature closure [54], rely less on the initial diagnostic hypothesis [51], and verify it by generating and exploring a wider variety of hypothetical diagnosisdifferential diagnosis [33,36,51,54].…”
Section: Interpreting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decisions are primarily about medical treatment and management [40,41,44,47], using various medical equipment, devices, and drugs, and occurring mostly with high density during the on-scene treatment phase of an emergency call [41]. Moreover, there are decisions made about the management of labor and delivery [41], nursing care and support [39,40,48,53,57,58], deterioration prevention [48], extrication and transport [41,44,47], and safetyrelated decisions focused on preventing and mitigating risks of all persons involved [33,40,47,48,50,57].…”
Section: Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting and implementing an option can be found in several articles that discuss the importance of selecting a safe, effective, situation-specific, appropriately prioritized and timed management plan and/or decision strategy [33,34,47,54,56]. The research highlights that experts can decide and act at the right time and place [32] based on incomplete information as emergency situations often require [43,60].…”
Section: Selecting and Implementing An Optionmentioning
Background: Situation awareness and decision making, listed in non-technical skills taxonomies, are critical for effective and safe performance in high-risk professions. These cognitive skills and their behavioral markers have been studied less in emergency medical services (EMS) crew members. This paper aims to review the existing literature and identify important aspects and behavioral markers of situation awareness and decision making in EMS crew membersthose who work in the role of prehospital emergency care providersand to synthesize findings as a basis for developing a rating and training tool. Method: The search for relevant articles was conducted using electronic databases, reference lists of relevant reviews and included articles and personal collection of articles. The selection process based on the PRISMA statement yielded a total of 30 articles that met the eligibility criteria. Their findings were qualitatively synthesized using the structured approach, informed by the already known structure: situation awareness and its elements (gathering information, interpreting information, anticipating future states), decision making and its elements (generating and considering options, selecting and implementing an option, reviewing outcome/decision). Moreover, the element of maintaining standards also emerged as highly relevant for cognitive skills. Results: This review found an increased research interest in the non-technical cognitive skills of EMS crew members. The majority of included articles' research designs were qualitative, then mixed, Delphi, and quantitative. It revealed several specifics of cognitive skills, such as EMS crew members need to holistically assess a wide range of cues and information, to make various health-and safety-related decisions and take EMS standards into account. However, there was only a limited number of observable markers of cognitive skills, such as acts and verbalizations, that could be considered as examples of good behavior. In addition, findings indicate a lack of articles focused on mass-casualty incidents and the interconnection of cognitive skills with other non-technical and medical skills. Conclusion: Further research is needed to get a more comprehensive view of behavioral markers of cognitive skills and to develop a rating and training tool to improve EMS crew members' cognitive performance.
“…The synthesis combines information from focused assessments that are here separated, yet in EMS professionals' minds, they tend to overlap. The main assessment is focused on child or adult patients [42], and their various medical conditions and problems [31,33,37 2), participant who did not state their profession (n = 4) The behavioral rating system includes one relevant categorygathering information. It is comprised of three elements and associated markers: conducting a risk assessment of the scene and ensuring it is safe to approach the patient before proceeding (e.g., noting any environmental hazards to self and the patient, stating the decision to approach the patient or not), reviewing decisions to ensure they are still appropriate requesting a second opinion from others (e.g., discussing alternative suggestions, stating the final decision), and trying alternative options when a certain approach is not working (e.g., stating alternative approach/intervention to be tried, beginning to use new approach/intervention).…”
Section: Situation Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be valuable sources of information to manage the emergency situation to a satisfying conclusion. It also emerged that it was crucial for those in a high-risk EMS profession to assess the environment and the safety of patients, bystanders, and personnel on scene and in the ambulance [31,33,34,38,40,41,47,48,55,57]. This means assessing clues and significant objects in the environment that can give a notion of what happens and to assess potential risks and threats.…”
Section: Situation Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the collected information, EMS crew members made interpretations that are part of their mental model of the call. Although making good interpretations of patient's medical conditions is considered to be one of the required attributes [42,57], it is critical to evaluate findings while discriminating between relevant and irrelevant data, avoid premature closure [54], rely less on the initial diagnostic hypothesis [51], and verify it by generating and exploring a wider variety of hypothetical diagnosisdifferential diagnosis [33,36,51,54].…”
Section: Interpreting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decisions are primarily about medical treatment and management [40,41,44,47], using various medical equipment, devices, and drugs, and occurring mostly with high density during the on-scene treatment phase of an emergency call [41]. Moreover, there are decisions made about the management of labor and delivery [41], nursing care and support [39,40,48,53,57,58], deterioration prevention [48], extrication and transport [41,44,47], and safetyrelated decisions focused on preventing and mitigating risks of all persons involved [33,40,47,48,50,57].…”
Section: Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting and implementing an option can be found in several articles that discuss the importance of selecting a safe, effective, situation-specific, appropriately prioritized and timed management plan and/or decision strategy [33,34,47,54,56]. The research highlights that experts can decide and act at the right time and place [32] based on incomplete information as emergency situations often require [43,60].…”
Section: Selecting and Implementing An Optionmentioning
Background: Situation awareness and decision making, listed in non-technical skills taxonomies, are critical for effective and safe performance in high-risk professions. These cognitive skills and their behavioral markers have been studied less in emergency medical services (EMS) crew members. This paper aims to review the existing literature and identify important aspects and behavioral markers of situation awareness and decision making in EMS crew membersthose who work in the role of prehospital emergency care providersand to synthesize findings as a basis for developing a rating and training tool. Method: The search for relevant articles was conducted using electronic databases, reference lists of relevant reviews and included articles and personal collection of articles. The selection process based on the PRISMA statement yielded a total of 30 articles that met the eligibility criteria. Their findings were qualitatively synthesized using the structured approach, informed by the already known structure: situation awareness and its elements (gathering information, interpreting information, anticipating future states), decision making and its elements (generating and considering options, selecting and implementing an option, reviewing outcome/decision). Moreover, the element of maintaining standards also emerged as highly relevant for cognitive skills. Results: This review found an increased research interest in the non-technical cognitive skills of EMS crew members. The majority of included articles' research designs were qualitative, then mixed, Delphi, and quantitative. It revealed several specifics of cognitive skills, such as EMS crew members need to holistically assess a wide range of cues and information, to make various health-and safety-related decisions and take EMS standards into account. However, there was only a limited number of observable markers of cognitive skills, such as acts and verbalizations, that could be considered as examples of good behavior. In addition, findings indicate a lack of articles focused on mass-casualty incidents and the interconnection of cognitive skills with other non-technical and medical skills. Conclusion: Further research is needed to get a more comprehensive view of behavioral markers of cognitive skills and to develop a rating and training tool to improve EMS crew members' cognitive performance.
IntroductionInternationally, the development of emergency medical services (EMS) educational standards from a post-employment to pre-employment model has gained considerable momentum. In Saudi Arabia specifically, the evolution to university-based EMS degrees has proceeded swiftly. However, the fast pace of development has contributed to considerable disparities in educational approaches between university programs. Therefore, the development of an empirically-based core competency framework is of considerable importance. The aim of this paper is to utilise confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through structural equation modelling to confirm the theoretically developed Saudi ParamEdic Competency Scale (SPECS) model.MethodsA national cross-sectional study design with purposive sampling technique was utilised with Saudi Red Crescent Authority healthcare providers. The SPECS instrument included 41 core competency items measured on a self-reported Likert scale. The maximum likelihood method was used with all the one factor congeneric and complete CFA models.ResultsIn total, 477 EMS healthcare professionals contributed to the study: 444 (93.1%) men and 33 (6.9%) women. Of the participants, 282 (59.1%) were 29–39 years of age and 264 (55.3%) had 5 to 9 years’ experience. A CFA of the SPECS model confirmed five congeneric factors within the adequate fit measurement indices: professionalism, preparedness, communication, clinical, and personal. There was one higher order factor titled ‘paramedic competency’.ConclusionThe CFA results support the SPECS as a reliable, valid, unidimensional and psychometrically sound model for operationalisation into Saudi university curricula. The confirmed model is made up of 27 items with five factors and an overarching latent higher order construct. The SPECS model represents an empirically developed blueprint for adoption into Saudi Arabian university programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.