Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Spallation Materials Technology 2020
DOI: 10.7566/jpscp.28.081007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Neutron Shielding Concrete Containing Colemanite and Peridotite

Abstract: This article is published by the Physical Society of Japan under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Any further distribution of this work P r o c e e d i n g s o f t h e 1 4 t h I n t e r n a t i o n a l W o r k s h o p o n S p a l l a t i o n M a t e r i a l s T e c h n o l o g y D o w n l o a d e d f r o m j o u r n a l s. j p s. j p b y 4 4. 2 2 4. 2 5 0. 2 0 0 o n 0 9 / 2 6 / 2 0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the preliminary cost-benefit analysis on this barite concrete recommends use prior to the normal concrete which poses activation concerns, other material types should be investigated for a full and complete database production. Other concrete-based materials such as the colemanite and the peridotite concrete were investigated by Koichi et al [55], and they obtained the neutron transmission through such material to be appropriate and that it reduced at maximum the shielding wall of about 25 cm compared to ordinary concrete [55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the preliminary cost-benefit analysis on this barite concrete recommends use prior to the normal concrete which poses activation concerns, other material types should be investigated for a full and complete database production. Other concrete-based materials such as the colemanite and the peridotite concrete were investigated by Koichi et al [55], and they obtained the neutron transmission through such material to be appropriate and that it reduced at maximum the shielding wall of about 25 cm compared to ordinary concrete [55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%