2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of neural specialization for print: Evidence for predictive coding in visual word recognition

Abstract: How a child’s brain develops specialization for print is poorly understood. One longstanding account is selective neuronal tuning to regularity of visual-orthographic features, which predicts a monotonically increased neural activation for inputs with higher regularity during development. However, we observed a robust interaction between a stimulus’ orthographic regularity (bottom-up input) and children’s lexical classification ability (top-down prediction): N1 response, which is the first negative component o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the N1 is a strong candidate in the search for a marker of print specialization and early identification of reading impairments. Moreover, the N1 has recently shown a reponse pattern supporting the predictive coding framework in that the N1 to Chinese characters with low visual-orthographic regularity was stronger in children with poor lexical classification skills, but lower in children with high lexical performance ( Zhao et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, the N1 is a strong candidate in the search for a marker of print specialization and early identification of reading impairments. Moreover, the N1 has recently shown a reponse pattern supporting the predictive coding framework in that the N1 to Chinese characters with low visual-orthographic regularity was stronger in children with poor lexical classification skills, but lower in children with high lexical performance ( Zhao et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To our knowledge, different functional components of word recognition have been studied using general contrast of words with pseudofonts and/or consonant strings 13 , but not yet by directly manipulating orthographic regularity and lexical representation(s) separately. Additionally, studies have shown that perceptual tuning of posterior vOT to sublexical and lexical orthographic features develops when reading experience increases 92,93 . Therefore, isolating perceptual and lexical processing experimentally will be interesting to explore to understand how children's brains develop specialized visual-orthographic processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, different functional components of word recognition have been studied using general contrast of words with pseudofonts and/or consonant strings (Lerma-Usabiaga et al, 2018), but not yet by directly manipulating orthographic regularity and lexical representation(s) separately. Additionally, studies have shown that perceptual tuning of posterior vOT to sublexical and lexical orthographic features develops when reading experience increases (Binder et al, 2006;Zhao et al, 2019). Therefore, isolating perceptual and lexical processing experimentally will be interesting to explore to understand how children's brains develop specialized visual-orthographic processing.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%