2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of nanocellulose scaffolds with tunable structures to support 3D cell culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Nanocellulose-based foams and aerogels have been shown to support growth and proliferation of cells. 94,97 Using 3D TEMPO-CNF aerogel scaffolds for cell cultures resulted in less than 5% of cell death aer 72 h of cell growth. 97 An even lower cell death was observed when low charge density TEMPO-CNF (1.56 mmol g À1 against 2.04 mmol g À1 ) was used to form the scaffolds.…”
Section: Scaffolds For Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Nanocellulose-based foams and aerogels have been shown to support growth and proliferation of cells. 94,97 Using 3D TEMPO-CNF aerogel scaffolds for cell cultures resulted in less than 5% of cell death aer 72 h of cell growth. 97 An even lower cell death was observed when low charge density TEMPO-CNF (1.56 mmol g À1 against 2.04 mmol g À1 ) was used to form the scaffolds.…”
Section: Scaffolds For Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pore diameter and distribution or fiber size and alignment are often analyzed by randomly picking at least dozens of various segments by means of image J software [65,109]. Individual scaffold dimensions can be measured with digital calipers [108,110]. Scaffold porosity can be determined using liquid displacement method [104].…”
Section: Morphology and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, MOAs with long aspect ratio fibers render a larger amount of empty areas, thus preventing breakage and conferring plasticity upon material. Specific compressive strength measured for the toughest MOAs (NiDTA‐100: 12725 J kg −1 ; NiDTA‐50: 1662 J kg −1 ; and PdDTA: 258 J kg −1 ) is far higher than that found for the unique MOF‐aerogel mechanically characterized, and somewhat higher than many carbon, organic, ceramic, and metal aerogels, and comparable to some conventional polymeric foams like polystyrene, polyurethane, etc. (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%