2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
198
0
31

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
198
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many different lean strategies as in [24] and various maintenance performances measurement frameworks [15]. Although the "lean" management concept has its roots in the automotive industry, it has been successfully used in insurance and IT companies, health care, in public activities such as the civil service and education [16], aircraft maintenance and repair [3], and many industrial branches as described in [6].…”
Section: Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different lean strategies as in [24] and various maintenance performances measurement frameworks [15]. Although the "lean" management concept has its roots in the automotive industry, it has been successfully used in insurance and IT companies, health care, in public activities such as the civil service and education [16], aircraft maintenance and repair [3], and many industrial branches as described in [6].…”
Section: Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mnogi autori navode da je za efikasno upravljanje održava-njem neophodno usklađeno posmatrati proces održa-vanja i primarni proces u kompaniji [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Pored toga, autori ističu da postoji značajan uticaj procesa održavanja na primarni proces u kompaniji [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Critical Component Identification (Dehghania et al, 2012) (Cavalcante et al , 2007) Measuring/Assessment Efficiency (Wang et al, 2010) (Muchiri et al, 2011;Vujanovićet al, 2012;Van & Pintelon, 2014) Sun (2004); Peck et al (1998);Ozbek et al (2010a,b); Hjalmarsson et al (1996); Liu & Yu (2004); Rouse et al (2002);Fallah-Fini et al (2015); Jeon et al (2011);Roll et al (1989); Charnes et al (1984) (de un Caso, 2008) (e Costa et al, 2012) Maintenance Action Selection (Kumar & Maiti, 2012) (Alarcón et al, 2007;Thor et al, 2013) Tan et al (2011);Fouladgar et al (2012) developed MCDM-based maintenance policy selection frameworks taking into account maintenance cost, addedvalue and safety dimensions. Shahin et al (2012) rather focused on the selection of appropriate (optimum) maintenance strategies, paying special attention to reliability, availability and maintainability criteria and potential interdependencies (via ANP).…”
Section: Expert Maintenance Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%