2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of KMnO4-releasing composites for in situ chemical oxidation of TCE-contaminated groundwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While potassium permanganate (KMnO 4 ) has demonstrated effective oxidation of recalcitrant organic contaminants, paraffin wax possessing the attributes of being unreactive and morphologically sturdy has been an increasingly popular choice of material to contain reactive reagents in the forms of candle 54 , pellet 55 , and microcapsule 56 . Other types of chemically resistant polymers such as polycaprolactone 57 and polyurethane 58 , have also been applied as the primary binding material for similar reasons. These encapsulated particles or pellets gradually dissolved in solutions of designation and are invariably effective for single uses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While potassium permanganate (KMnO 4 ) has demonstrated effective oxidation of recalcitrant organic contaminants, paraffin wax possessing the attributes of being unreactive and morphologically sturdy has been an increasingly popular choice of material to contain reactive reagents in the forms of candle 54 , pellet 55 , and microcapsule 56 . Other types of chemically resistant polymers such as polycaprolactone 57 and polyurethane 58 , have also been applied as the primary binding material for similar reasons. These encapsulated particles or pellets gradually dissolved in solutions of designation and are invariably effective for single uses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts to address this ISCO challenge have focused on developing slow-release oxidants that can supply a continuous input of oxidant to a contaminated aquifer for months to years (Lee and Schwartz, 2007a;Ross et al, 2005;Swearingen and Swearingen, 2008). The idea of encapsulating oxidants as a slow-release treatment for contaminated aquifers was first proposed more than a decade ago (Kang et al, 2004;Ross et al, 2005;Schwartz, 2005) and since then, increased interest has appeared in a number of publications that have documented the effectiveness of slow-release oxidants to remove groundwater contaminants at the bench-scale and in larger flow-tank systems (Kambhu et al, 2017(Kambhu et al, , 2012Lee et al, 2009Lee et al, , 2008bLee et al, , 2008aSchwartz, 2007b, 2007a;Liang et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2020;Rauscher et al, 2012;Swearingen and Swearingen, 2008;Yang et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2013). In their analysis of peer-reviewed research involving controlled-release materials for groundwater remediation, O'Connor et al indicated that of the 30 publications identified, most have been published in the last five years (O'Connor et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) using strong oxidants has drawn much attention for being one promising remedial alternative [5-9]. Several strong oxidants, such as ozone [10], Fenton’s reagent [11], permanganate [12], calcium peroxide [13] as well as persulfate [14,15], have been used for ISCO applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%