2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219739
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of interval-valued fuzzy GRA with SERVPERF based on subjective and objective weights for evaluation of airline service quality: A case study of Korea low-cost carriers

Abstract: As the airline industry has become ever-more competitive and profitability more tenuous, airline service quality management has grown more important to airlines. Although many studies have focused on the evaluation of airline service quality, some common limitations need to be noted. First, traditional fuzzy logics were utilized to present linguistic variables as fuzzy numbers. However, precise quantification of lower and upper bounds with a single number is often difficult; thus, interval-valued fuzzy sets th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, it can investigate the connections between two alternatives through a distance function (Kuo and Liang 2011 ). In addition to being comprehensible and computationally simple, the GRA method presents certain flexibility that allows for considering different weighting coefficients on the factors being examined (Geum et al 2011 ; Lee and Kang 2019 ; Wu 2002 ).…”
Section: Research Gaps and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it can investigate the connections between two alternatives through a distance function (Kuo and Liang 2011 ). In addition to being comprehensible and computationally simple, the GRA method presents certain flexibility that allows for considering different weighting coefficients on the factors being examined (Geum et al 2011 ; Lee and Kang 2019 ; Wu 2002 ).…”
Section: Research Gaps and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SERVPERF examines customers' impressions of the service they received, whereas the SERVQUAL assesses both the customers' demands of the service and their perception of the actual service supplied (Carrasco et al, 2018;Hossain et al, 2014;Ingaldi, 2016). It is premised on the estimation of the actual service perceived other than the anticipations of the customers' expectations towards the service (Lee and Kang, 2019;Rasyida et al, 2016;Yu and Hyun, 2019). The developers of this model argue that service quality is better measured by perceptions of the actual performance than by the difference between expectations and perceptions (Haque and Sultan, 2019;Rodrigues et al, 2011).…”
Section: Gronroos' Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, in their assessment of the service quality, Cronin and Taylor utilised the performance-only items of the original SERVQUAL Model and avoided the confusion created by the expectation variables of the SERVQUAL (Ghotbabadi et al, 2015a). The SERVPERF is arguably more efficient as compared to the SERVQUAL as it cuts the number of assessment items by half (S. Lee and Kang, 2019;Mahmoud and Khalifa, 2015;Rasyida et al, 2016). Since the SERVPERF is a modification of the SERVQUAL Model, it uses 22 items out of 44 items of the SERVQUAL, taking performance-only items and leaving the expectation items (Al-Damen, 2017; Lee and Kang, 2019;Mahmoud and Khalifa, 2015).…”
Section: Gronroos' Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations