1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(96)01572-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of in vitro derived bovine embryos following pronuclear transplantation and in vitro culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PT had no detrimental effect on cleavage and blastocyst development rates. This is in agreement with results obtained after pronuclear transfer in embryos of cattle produced by in vitro fertilization (Westhusin and De Azambuja, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PT had no detrimental effect on cleavage and blastocyst development rates. This is in agreement with results obtained after pronuclear transfer in embryos of cattle produced by in vitro fertilization (Westhusin and De Azambuja, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pronuclear transfer (McGrath and Solter, 1984;Westhusin and De Azambuja, 1996) was performed in HSOF with 7.5 g/mL cytochalasin B. Four experimental groups were produced: two in the PT control group, where removed karyoplast (pronucleus and adjacent cytoplasm) of one zygote was transferred back to the perivitelline space of the same zygote in S (S-PT; n = 216) or D (D-PT; n = 165) treatments; and two in the PT differentially activated group, where the karyoplast was removed from a zygote of one activation treatment and was then transferred to a previously enucleated zygote from the other treatment, which allowed the production of embryos with S cytoplasm and D nucleus (SCDN; n = 255) and D cytoplasm and S nucleus (DCSN; n = 279).…”
Section: Pronuclear Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%