2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of immunosensor based on OWLS technique for determining Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Affinity-based surface plasmon resonance sensors (SPR) have the advantage of not requiring any labelling of the target mycotoxin (Tü dö s et al 2003) and may become an alternative method for rapid screening, which also enables the simultaneous detection of multiple mycotoxins using serial connected flow cells (van der Gaag et al 2003). In a further label-free immunochemical approach for the detection of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A, optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) was used with integrated optical waveguide sensor chips measuring the resonance incoupling angle of polarized light, thus determining the surface coverage (Adányi et al 2007).…”
Section: Immunochemical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity-based surface plasmon resonance sensors (SPR) have the advantage of not requiring any labelling of the target mycotoxin (Tü dö s et al 2003) and may become an alternative method for rapid screening, which also enables the simultaneous detection of multiple mycotoxins using serial connected flow cells (van der Gaag et al 2003). In a further label-free immunochemical approach for the detection of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A, optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) was used with integrated optical waveguide sensor chips measuring the resonance incoupling angle of polarized light, thus determining the surface coverage (Adányi et al 2007).…”
Section: Immunochemical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results should be confirmed with the reference method (Prieto-Simon, et al, 2007;Rodrigues-Mozas,et al, 2007). It was shown in the literature that some electrochemical biosensors showed excellent sensitivity with LODs below 0.1 μg/kg (Micheli, et al, 2005;Piermarini, et al, 2007) while those based on optical detection reached LODs comparable with ELISA (0.5-10 μg/kg) (Adanyi, et al, 2007;Prieto-Simon, et al, 2007). Although traditional immunoassay based methods such as ELISA, have been applied widely to mycotoxin detection.…”
Section: Figure 2 General Schematic Representation Of Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Array sensor is a good tool for multiple compounds. For determination of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A in the same operation, Adányi et al (Adányi et al, 2007) devised a solid-array sensor with a sensitive detection range of 0.5-10 ng mL-1 using a competitive detection method.…”
Section: Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%