2019
DOI: 10.1080/1343943x.2018.1562309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of hand tractor-mounted seed drill for rice-based cropping systems in the Philippines

Abstract: Dry direct-seeded rice is widely practiced in drought-prone environments in tropical Asia where mechanized options for crop establishment are in great demand. The objective of this study is to identify the suitable design of a hand tractor-mounted multigrain seed drill under biophysical conditions in the Philippines. The prototype was newly designed and tested under field conditions in three provinces in 2015 and 2016. The results suggested that the prototype with tined furrow openers and an inclined circular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole experimental field area was prepared dry by plowing once, rotavating 2-3 times, and leveling once using a four-wheel tractor with an attached rotavator and leveler to achieve well-pulverized soil. After 2 wk, a drought-resistant inbred variety (NSIC Rc 222) was dryseeded using a hand-tractor-drawn multipurpose-seeder at a 60 kg ha -1 seeding rate (Bautista et al 2019). Compacted bunds and canals spaced at 0.5 m between plots as buffer zones were constructed to reduce seepage between plots during irrigation.…”
Section: Crop Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole experimental field area was prepared dry by plowing once, rotavating 2-3 times, and leveling once using a four-wheel tractor with an attached rotavator and leveler to achieve well-pulverized soil. After 2 wk, a drought-resistant inbred variety (NSIC Rc 222) was dryseeded using a hand-tractor-drawn multipurpose-seeder at a 60 kg ha -1 seeding rate (Bautista et al 2019). Compacted bunds and canals spaced at 0.5 m between plots as buffer zones were constructed to reduce seepage between plots during irrigation.…”
Section: Crop Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of differences in seed damage by the two seed metering devices using one-way ANOVA (Table 3) showed statically significant differences (p < 0.05) with the right hand seed metering device damaging more seed (5.2%) than that on the left hand side (3.7%). The relatively high seed damage may be attributed to flaws in the fabrication of the metering devices; for example, [26] attributed high percentage of damaged seeds to inadequate clearance in the seed metering device. According to [10], seed damage increased with increasing metering device speed and this was attributed to shearing and jumping of seeds against the wall of the hopper at high speeds and the magnitude of damage depended on the strength of the seeds.…”
Section: Performance Of the Planting Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-purpose seeder (MPS) was developed for DDSR, coupled with cultural packages such as improved crop establishment, appropriate variety, and nutrient management (Bautista et al 2019). It was concluded based on a 3 yr (2018 − 2020) on-farm trials (136 farms) in selected rice growing areas in the Philippines covering 16 provinces that the current seeding rate of 240 kg ha -1 can be reduced to 60 kg ha -1 without sacrificing the yield level (Bautista et al 2022). Moreover, DDSR resulted to a reduction in crop establishment (seed rate, labor cost, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, DDSR resulted to a reduction in crop establishment (seed rate, labor cost, etc.) by 20 − 47% (Bueno et al 2022), reduction in the cost of producing per kg of rice grain yield by 15 − 25% (Bautista et al 2022;Bueno et al 2022), an increase in grain yield by 15 − 25% (increment of 0.6 − 0.8 t ha -1 ) attributed to the uniform crop establishment by mechanized seeding and imposed best DDSR management practices (Bueno et al 2022), and an increase in the Return on Investment on a per hectare basis, ranging from PhP 8050 to as high as PhP 14150 (Banayo et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%